Epstein Secrets

tat. (2017). In Fischman v. Klarquist, Sparkman, Campbell, Leigh & Winston, Civ. No. 94-1057, 1995 WL 2642

a Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 [email protected] Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 [email protected] [email protected] scarolateam@sea

hich this Court should reject. The trial court specifically found, "I'm not finding fault with anything you [Scott Link] or Miss Rockenbach or Miss Campbell did. That's not the issue. You've done your job." 2 EFTA00805459 (App. D-2, 59:24).2 The heightened and false sense of urgency exhibited by Paul

ch Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter- Plaintiff Bradley I Edwards Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter- Plaintiff Bradley I Edwa

trial 6 EFTA00793722 court's attention: "So I again want to make clear that I'm finding absolutely no fault with Mr. Link, Miss Rockenbach, Miss Campbell or anyone else from the Link and Rockenbach firm in terms of what they did. . ." (App. D-2, 61:15-18.) Indisputably, it was Epstein who — even befo

[email protected] [email protected] Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter- Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Philip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. Courthouse Commons, Suite 350 444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 [email protected] [email protected] kbt@FLAppe

Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Mandamus is "a proper vehicle to enforce the time restrictions for the setting of a trial under rule 1.440." Campbell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 204 So. 3d 476, 479 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (citing Genuine Parts Co. v. Parsons, 917 So. 2d 419, 421 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) an

his Petition was furnished via email this 8'h day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Sears , Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. and i 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards B

ing so because the appellant already will have been forced to trial in violation of the rule. [e.a.] Gawker Media, LLC, 170 So. 3d at 131. See also Campbell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 204 So. 3d 476, 479 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (citing Gawker, and stating: "In that context, the appellate remedy was deemed i

ia email this 8th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Shipley, P.A. Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 350 1 o- ounse or ee ant Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Edwards Pottin er LLC o- ounse or ee nt ounter-Plainti