Epstein Secrets

t be: an "efficient and compelling purpose," United States v. Meacham, 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10' Cir. 1997); a "motivating purpose," United States v Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1083 (56 Cir. 1995), or "at least one of the defendant's motivations for taking the trip in the first place," United States v Ellis,

See also United States v. Root 296 F.3d 1222, 1227- 28 (11'h Cir. 2002); United States v. Sims, 428 F.3d 945, 959 (10th Cir. 2005)• United States v. Helder, 452 F.3d 751 (8'h Cir. 2006); United States v. Meek, 366 F.3d 705, 717- EFTA00605410 Alan Dershowitz, Esq. November 19, 2007 Page 9 20 (9ib Cir

[None] Use of internet to entice 14011 minor to engage in sex activity. 05- Timothy 4 2 counts of 2422(b) Use of internet to entice 14024 Campbell 18 U.S.C.S. 2252(a)(2); minor to engage in sex activity. 18 U.S.C.S. 2252(A)(4)(B) Received and possessed child pornography that had been tr

crime. See United States'. Root, 296 F.3d 1222, 1227-32 (j1 di Cir. 2002); United States' Sims, 428 F.3d 945, 9a9 (10th Cir. 2005); United Stalest. Helder, 452 F.3d 751 (8th Cir. 2006); United States'. Meek, 366 F.3d 705, 717-20 (9th Cir. 2004). Likewise, the Circuits have rejected void for vagueness,

1 [None] Use of intemet to entice 14011 minor to engage in sex activity. 05- Timothy 4 2 counts of 2422(b) Use of intemet to entice 14024 Campbell 18 U.S.C.S. 2252(aX2); minor to engage in sex activity. 18 U.S.C.S. 2252(AX4XB) Received and possessed child pornography that had been trans

ime. See United States v. Root, 296 F.3d 1222, 1227-32 (11th Cir. 2002); United States v. Sims, 428 F.3d 945, 959 (10th Cir. 2005); United States x Helder, 452 F.3d 751 (8th Cir. 2006); United States v. Meek, 366 F.3d 705, 717-20 (9th Cir. 2004). Likewise, the Circuits have rejected void for vagueness,

[None] Use of intemet to entice 14011 minor to engage in sex activity. 05- "I imothy 4 2 counts of 2422(6) Use of intemet to entice 14024 Campbell 18 U.S.C.S. 2252(aX2); minor to engage in sex activity. 18 U.S.C.S. 2252(AX4)(B) Received and possessed child pornography that had been tran

thrrime. See nited States v. Root, 296 t3d 1222, 1227-32 ( 1°' Cir. 2002). United States Sims, 428 3d 945, 959 (10° Cir. 1 005); United States I Helder, 45213d 751 (8th Cir. 2006); United States !Meek, 366 3d 705, 717-20 (9th Cir. 2004). Likewise, the Circuits have rejected void or vagueness, overb