Epstein Secrets

t be: an "efficient and compelling purpose," United States v. Meacham, 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10' Cir. 1997); a "motivating purpose," United States v Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1083 (56 Cir. 1995), or "at least one of the defendant's motivations for taking the trip in the first place," United States v Ellis,

involving wrongdoing in municipal government and in the trade union movement bi 1969 I became the Chief Assistant to the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey. From 1970 to 1971, I was the acting United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey. From 1971 through 1973, I was the United States Attorne

al conduct must be: an "efficient end compelliog purpos United States' Meacham 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10°' Cir. 1991); a "motivating purpose," Unitt. Campbell 49 F.3d 1079, 1083 (5° 1995), or "at least one of the defendant's motivations for taking the trip in the first place," United States I. Ellis 935 F

nvolving wrongdoing in municipal government and in the trade union movement. In 1969 I became the Chief Assistant to the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey. From 1970 to 1971, 1 was the acting United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey. From 1971 through 1973, I was the United States Attorne

trict of Illinois, Eastern Division, William J. Campbell, Chief Judge, entered judg- ment dismissing the p

MAPIRI and Joseph Carmine UNITED STATES of America, John N. Mitchell, Attorney General of the V. S., Frederick II. InceY, United States AtFy for the District of New Jersey, and John Doe, any Federal Law Enforce- ment Officer Joseph Caruano, Appellant In No. 18903 Charles Majurf, Appellant in No. 15904. Nos. 18003, 1