Epstein Secrets

hich this Court should reject. The trial court specifically found, "I'm not finding fault with anything you [Scott Link] or Miss Rockenbach or Miss Campbell did. That's not the issue. You've done your job." 2 EFTA00805459 (App. D-2, 59:24).2 The heightened and false sense of urgency exhibited by Paul

te disk containing all the confidential materials..." (Joinder, p. 3). There is no dispute that the documents maintained on a disc transferred from Fowler White are eight years old. There is further no dispute that Edwards and Cassell are fully aware of the documents contained on the disc — they claim the c

ervice. Begin forwarded message: From: "Tina L. Campbell" < Date: March 14, 2018 at 4:28:30 PM EDT To: "

pecial master to review 8 thousands of documents several days before the 9 commencement of trial for the first time, despite 10 recalcitrance from Fowler White, their somebody 11 reviewing their files apparently for the first time 12 mere weeks before the case is going to court, those 13 types of things

trial 6 EFTA00793722 court's attention: "So I again want to make clear that I'm finding absolutely no fault with Mr. Link, Miss Rockenbach, Miss Campbell or anyone else from the Link and Rockenbach firm in terms of what they did. . ." (App. D-2, 61:15-18.) Indisputably, it was Epstein who — even befo

etting out in two affidavits (1) the chain of custody which irrefutably establish that Link & Rockenbach, PA properly obtained the "materials" from Fowler White, Epstein's prior counsel (App. C) and (2) an opinion by ethics expert, Tim Chinaris, who had authored thousands of ethics opinions for over a decad