Epstein Secrets

194] because Fowler White allegedly retained a copy of the "subject documents" and passed these documents on to Mr. Epstein and his current counsel, Scott Link and Kara Rockenbach. [D.E. 6326 at 6-11]. The Court incorporates by reference the allegations made by Farmer Jaffe in the Motion for Order to Show

otion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not be Held in Contempt of Court, to Penn it Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief [D.E. 6326] (the "Motion for Order to Show Cause"), the Responses [D.E. 6351, 6355], and the Reply [D.E. 6358] th

k between the printing of the documents in December 2010 and 2 Movants claim that current counsel for Jeffrey Epstein in a pending state court case (Scott Link, Esq.) sent counsel for Bradley Edwards in that case (Jack Scarola, Esq.) a flash drive which purported to duplicate "the disc we located in Fowler

Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Relief (DE 6323; re-docketed as DE 6326) and Bradley Edwards' Joinder in Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause (DE 6325)i. T

Robert Carney, Jeffrey Epstein, Fowler White Attorney Joseph L. Ackerman, Fowler White Attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez, Jack Goldberger, Tina Campbell, Scott Link, Kara Rockenbach, and the currently unidentified attorneys that Mr. Link has represented are also working on this case on behalf of Epstein from the

r Jaffe its Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief, that a prima facie case has been made this the Court's order has been violated, now ORDERS as follows: I. Fowler