Epstein Secrets

rated EAI: 34,500 CLerent yield: 4.94% Original cost basis 393,704.74 Nov 14, 11 90.000.000 100.673 90,606.32 101.220 91,098 00 491 68 LT MICHIGAN MUN 8D AUTH RV RUN RATE 05.000% MATURES 1001126 CALLABLE 11/30/16 9 100.00 ACCRUED INTEREST 320.83 CUSJP 59455T485 Moody. Aaa SSP: AAA EAL 3

ce value a mattsity (4) Purchase pnced) Aduded cost basas Price on Aug 31 (5) Sue on Aug 31 (51 Unrealized gen or loss (S) Hddng period MICHIGAN MUN BO RUTH RV PREF BEM PRE.REFUNOECI RATE 05.000% MATURES 1001126 PREFERiNDED 1001(16 0 100.00 ACCRUED INTEREST 4937.49 CUSrP 5945573R1 Mood

r downed. This total is metaled in the arrant period closing vain Lending information For detared information at the firm's Itrodeg practices and Oakum . refer to your Chem Rationale, SDNY_GM_00022630 EFTA_00133250 EFTA01275387 Important information about your statement DOOMIMIND Agsement or AC

New International Dictionary 17 (2d ed. 1944) (defining "accused" as "one charged with an offense; the defendant in a criminal case"); see also "'Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625, 632,106 S.Ct. 1404, 89 L.Ed.2d 631 (1986) ("[A]fler a formal accusation has been made ... a person who had previously bee

re Acker, 596 F.3d 370, 373 (6th Cir. 2010). The district courts that have considered the question are divided. Compare, e.g., 1' United States it Oakum, No. 3:08CR132, 2009 WL 790042, at *2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 24, 2009) (holding that CVRA rights can attach prior to the commencement of criminal proceedi

fore charges were filed but were subject to the outer limit that the Government has at least “contemplated” charges.” Similarly, in United States v. Oakum,” the District Court for the Easter District of Virginia considered a claim that CVRA nghts did not apply until after a defendant had been convicted.

n Victims of Crime, 25 NEw ENG. J. oN CRIM. & CIV. CONFINEMENT 21, 64 & n.168 (1999) (citing to victims’ rights statutes in Connecticut, Hlinois, and Michigan, among others). Unfortunately, as some commentators have noted, the notice and conferral provisions in some states are ambiguous, and the absence of

re charges were filed but were subject to the outer limit that the Government has at least "contemplated" charges. 7! Similarly, in United States v. Oakum, ” the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia considered a claim that CVRA rights did not apply until after a defendant had been convict

Victims of Crime, 25 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 21, 64 & n.168 (1999) (citing to victims' rights statutes in Connecticut, Illinois, and Michigan, among others). Unfortunately, as some commentators have noted, the notice and conferral provisions in some states are ambiguous, and the absence of