Epstein Secrets

ge "the area 'immediately surrounding and associated with the home"' to be "'part of the home itself for Fourth Amendment purposes."' Jardines, 569 U. S., at 6 (quoting Oliver v. United States, 466 U. S. 170, 180 (1984)). "The protection afforded the curtilage is essentially a protection of families a

emplated by the permit applications submitted to your office, which are deemed to have been approved as of April 9, 2018. Therefore, we believe that the Cease & Desist should be rescinded immediately so that construction can be continued in accordance with the approved permits. We would also ask that your office a

ge "the area 'immediately surrounding and associated with the home"' to be "'part of the home itself for Fourth Amendment purposes."' Jardines, 569 U. S., at 6 (quoting Oliver v. United States, 466 U. S. 170, 180 (1984)). "The protection afforded the curtilage is essentially a protection of families a

emplated by the permit applications submitted to your office, which are deemed to have been approved as of April 9, 2018. Therefore, we believe that the Cease & Desist should be rescinded immediately so that construction can be continued in accordance with the approved permits. We would also ask that your office a

lage "the area 'immediately surrounding and associated with the home"' to be "part of the home itself for Fourth Amendment purposes." Jardines, 569 U. S., at 6 (quoting Oliver v. United States, 466 U. S. 170, 180 (1984)). 'The protection afforded the curtilage is essentially a protection of families a

emplated by the permit applications submitted to your office, which are deemed to have been approved as of April 9, 2018. Therefore, we believe that the Cease & Desist should be rescinded immediately so that construction can be continued in accordance with the approved permits. We would also ask that your office a