Epstein Secrets

confidential information governed by the protective order to other government agencies for the purpose of enforcing the criminal or civil laws of the United States. Thus, the Government seeks to reserve the right to use confidential information produced by Fisher in this case in unrelated civil or criminal ma

ce of parties and witnesses and in interest of justice bears burden of estab- lishing by preponderance of evidence that transfer is necessary. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a). 6. Federal Courts 6=101, 103, 105 Although trial judge is afforded great discretion in deciding motion to transfer for convenience of

March 13, 1998, after the Government submitted its motion, Diane Fisher executed the stipula- tion and order, also agreeing to be bound. To date, Soifer still has not executed the stipulation. Hence, the Government's motion for summary judgment against the Subten- ants is still pending with respect

RNATIONAL TREATIES AND STATUTORY SCHEMES A. The Foreign Missions Act of 1982 1. Pursuant to the FMA, 22 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq ., "the operation in the United States of foreign missions ... is a proper subject for the exercise of Federal jurisdiction." Id . § 4301(a). The FMA provides, inter alia , that "it is th

. Ron Soffer ("Soifer") is a resident of both the State of New York and France, with a business address at 34 East 69th Street, New York, New York. Soifer is named as a defendant EFTA00223036 because he is an unapproved occupant of the Premises; has availed herself of the use and benefits of the Pre

her & Sophir ("Fisher & Soffer") is a general partnership with a business address at 34 East 69th Street, New York, New York. Defendants Fisher and Soifer are partners in Fisher & Soffer. Fisher & Soifer is named as a defendant because it is an unapproved occupant of the Premises; has availed itself of

ter that federal law should apply, there is no federal statutory or common law governing landlord-tenant relations. Federal law should apply because the United States is a party. I have jurisdiction over this action based on 28 U.S.C. s 1345 and the FMA, 22 U.S.C. s 4301 et seq. The subject matter of this action i

Ron Soffer, did not sign the stipulation. He has not responded to the Government's motion because the motion is not returnable until April 20, 1998. Soifer, however, can have no greater rights than Fisher. Hence, the Government's motion is granted as to Soffer as well. Of course, if Soffer believes he