Epstein Secrets

racts, Epstein and Fisher continue, the lease between OFM and Epstein contains an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, citing Neal & Co. I. United States, 36 Fed. Cl. 600 (1996), affd, 121 F.3d 683 (Fed.Cir.1997). The requirement of good faith and fair dealing, they argue, prohibits OFM from withholdi

ter that federal law should apply, there is no federal statutory or common law governing landlord-tenant relations. Federal law should apply because the United States is a party. I have jurisdiction over this action based on 28 U.S.C. s 1345 and the FMA, 22 U.S.C. s 4301 et seq. The subject matter of this action i

dence by the Deputy Consul General of the Islamic Republic of Iran ("Iran"). After diplomatic and consular relations with Iran were severed in 1980, the Office of Foreign Missions ("OFM") of the United States Department of State took possession of the building pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. s 4301 et seq. OFM

confidential information governed by the protective order to other government agencies for the purpose of enforcing the criminal or civil laws of the United States. Thus, the Government seeks to reserve the right to use confidential information produced by Fisher in this case in unrelated civil or criminal ma

ce of parties and witnesses and in interest of justice bears burden of estab- lishing by preponderance of evidence that transfer is necessary. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a). 6. Federal Courts 6=101, 103, 105 Although trial judge is afforded great discretion in deciding motion to transfer for convenience of

e by the Deputy Consul General of the Islamic Re- public of Iran ("Iran"). After diplomatic and consular relations with Iran were severed in 1980, the Office of Foreign Missions ("0FM") of the United States Department of State took poas.ssion of the budding pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. § 4301 of seq. 0F

ter that federal law should apply, there is no federal statutory or common law governing landlord-tenant relations. Federal law should apply because the United States is a party. I have jurisdiction over this action based on 28 U.S.C. s 1345 and the FMA, 22 U.S.C. s 4301 et seq. The subject matter of this action i

dence by the Deputy Consul General of the Islamic Republic of Iran ("Iran"). After diplomatic and consular relations with Iran were severed in 1980, the Office of Foreign Missions ("OFM") of the United States Department of State took possession of the building pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. s 4301 et seq. OFM

RNATIONAL TREATIES AND STATUTORY SCHEMES A. The Foreign Missions Act of 1982 1. Pursuant to the FMA, 22 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq ., "the operation in the United States of foreign missions ... is a proper subject for the exercise of Federal jurisdiction." Id . § 4301(a). The FMA provides, inter alia , that "it is th

nformation and belief as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action by plaintiff United States of America (the "Government") on behalf of the Office of Foreign Missions ("OFM") of the United States Department of State (the "State Department") against defendants Jeffrey E. Epstein ("Epstein"), Ivan S. Fisher ("Fisher

Mary Jo White, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, by Serene Nakano, Assistant United States Attorney, New York City, for the United States. Gage & Pavlis, by G. Robert Gage, Jr., Ellen J. Casey, New York City, for Ivan S. Fisher. MEMORANDUM DECISION CHIN, J. *1 In this case, the Uni

ence by the Deputy Consul General of the Islamic Republic of Iran ("Iran"). After diplomatic and consular relations with Iran were severed in 1980, the Office of Foreign Missions ("OFM") of the United States Department of State took possession of the building pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. s 4301 et seq. OFM

4311(a). 24. The Secretary of State (the "Secretary") is empowered under the FMA to determine the treatment to be accorded to a foreign mission in the United States. Id. § 4301(c); see § 4302(a)(6). The FMA provides that "a denial by the Secretary involving a benefit of a foreign mission within the jurisdiction

nformation and belief as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action by plaintiff United States of America (the "Government") on behalf of the Office of Foreign Missions ("OFM") of the United States SONY_GM_02742766 EFTA _00229415 EFTA01324981 Department of State (the "State Department") against defendants Jeffre

ter that federal law should apply, there is no federal statutory or common law governing landlord-tenant relations. Federal law should apply because the United States is a party. I have jurisdiction over this action based on 28 U.S.C. s 1345 and the FMA, 22 U.S.C. s 4301 et seq. The subject matter of this action i

ence by the Deputy Consul General of the Islamic Republic of Iran ("Iran"). After diplomatic and consular relations with Iran were severed in 1980, the Office of Foreign Missions ("OFM") of the United States Department of State took possession of the building pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. s 4301 et seq. OFM