Epstein Secrets

2:44 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY Case 9:08-cv,80736-KA.ocurnen\ 48-5 Emered on FLSD Do.03/21/2011 I I :sentenced not later y,an October 26, 2007-. the UnitedjStates bas 110 objection to J;:pstein seJfsreporting to begin ~rving hls sentence ·not later than January 4, 2008. • 12. Epstein agrees that.he will no

lty and to ·provide compensation in the tQanner aescribed ab()ye, ifEpsteirt successfully fulfills allt>fthe tenns ~ _conditi9M of this agreement, the United Stat~s 1,1~0 agrees that it will niH institute: BilY criminal charges against any potential ~~onspirators ofEpstein, inclµding but not limited toi Sarah Ke

offense includcs; ;but is net limitadto; a conviction liy a foderabor miUtary'tribunal,-including courts-martial conducted by the Armed Forcos of tho United Status,, >and includes a conviction-orentry of a ploa of',guilty or nolo contendere resulting in a-sanctiun in anyistato of dio United-States or other juris

he gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. 13. The parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record. Ifthe United States receives a Freedom ofInformation Act request or any compulsory process commanding the disclosure of the agreement, it will provide notice to Epstein

ll.· .. attempt to obstruct justice, or ... to threaten, injure, or intimidate, a prospective witness or juror." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(t)(2)(B); see also United States v. Friedman, 837 F.2d 48 (2d Cir. 1988). The Bail Reform Act lists four factors to be considered in the detention analysis: (1) the nature and circ

text of the agreement purports to bind “the Government.” See Annabi, Tl\ F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (“Defendant’s argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it

u didn't, or no — ■ Page 151 i i 1 with Mr. Indyke? 2 A No. 3 Q There appear to be a number of 4 corporations. El Zorro Ranch Corporation, New York 5 Strategy Group, Ghislaine, G-HT-S-L-ArEN-E, 6 Corporation, J. Epstein and Company and the 7 Financial Strategy Group. Do you see those? 8 A Ido. 9 Q‘ Do you recall

nald, Director, in pursuance of the authority vested in me, do hereby authorize the above-named entity to transact business in the Virgin Islands of the United States. This C'ettlficytte ofitoensure is valid from January 1,2015 to beeestilier 31, 2015. Renewal of this Certificate olLicensure trsequired annually u

CE OF PROCESS FORM • RACA12 FILE COPY This smiling witnesseth that 1, the undersigned Business Basics VI, LLC having been designated by iancial Strategy Group. Ltd. as resident agent al said company, upon whom service of process may be mode in all suits arising against sold company in Iho Courts of the Un

20 21 22 23 24 25 April 20, 2011 9:02 a.m. Deposition of JEFFREY EPSTEIN, held at the offices of Cooley Godwin Kronish, 1114 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, before Laurie A. Collins, a Registered Professional Reporter and Notary Public of the State of New York. 212-267-6868 VERIT

Group myself or 12 Financial Trust Company would, or the money would 13 be paid directly to them. 14 Q. What is the business of Financial 15 Strategy Group? 10:50:41 16 A. It provides accounting services and 17 legal services. 18 Q. For whom? 19 A. For me. 20 Q. For anyone else? 10:50:45