Epstein Secrets

istent with how our circuit and others have articulated the doctrine. See, e.g., United States v. Villasenor. 608 F.3d 467. 471-72 (9th Cir.2010); United Stales v. Yang, 286 F.3d 940.945-46 (7th Cir.2002); United States v. Hyde, 37 F.3d 116. 120 n. 2 (3d Cit 1994); United States v. Santiago, 837 F.2d 1545.

010). Reasonable suspicion is required precisely because the individual has regained an expectation of privacy by moving away from the border. See United Slates v. Villasenor. 608 F.3d 467.471-72 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, —U.S., 131 S.Ct. 547. 178 L.Ed.2d 401 (2010); United States v. Whiting. 781 F.2d 692.

bing a functional border search and those describing an extended border search, not in defining the standard for a search at the border. See, e.g., United States v. Cardona, 769 F.2d 625, 628 (9th Cir.1985) ("We have recently recognized the difficulty of making sharp distinctions between searches at the func

he Court has expressed support for the deterrence value of suspicionless searches of a routine nature, such as vehicle checkpoints near the border. See United States v. Maninez— Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 556, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1976) ("We note here only the substantiality of the public interest in the p

t users of mobile electronic devices password protect their files. See generally United States Department of Commerce, Computer Security Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Computer Security (2007) (NISI Special Publication 800- 1l l). Computer users are routinely advised—and in some cases, required by employers—to pr

ANGES WHICH ARE SET FORTH HEREIN. IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS: 30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFERORCONTRACTOR Digitally si • ned DN: cn ItialiRol emal Date: Sit UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (SIGNATURE o=Sig Net orOntoLus,...-ice. O8D i9200)30•C0 II •ISOMO046359) 20100)3113.007SI OVOCe DATE SIGNED 31b NAME OF THE CONTRACTING OFFICER

regulations and guidance found in the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2014 ("FISMA"), Privacy Act of 1974, E- Government Act of 2002, National Institute of Standards and Technology ("NIST') Special Publications ("SF'), including NIST SP 800-37, 800.53, and 800.60 Volumes I and II, Federal Information Processing Standards ("FIPS

CITATION Olt6CX 5) oicLuouro ANY ADDITIONS CR GANGES LYNCH ARE SET FORTH HEREIN. IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS: 30e. SONATWIE OF OFFEROPICONTRACTOR 31t WETED STATES OF AMERICA (SWARM OPOONIIMOTENPOWISER) An. NAAIE AND TITLE OF SIGNER (TYPE OR PRIM) At DATE SIGNED 13IA NAME OF THE CONTPACTIVG OFFICER (TYPE ORPawl) 314. D

regulations and guidance found in the Federal Information Security Management Act of 2014 ("FISMA"), Privacy Act of 1974, E- Government Act of 2002, National Institute of Standards and Technology ("KIST') Special Publications ("SP"), including MST SP 800-37, 800-53, and 800-60 Volumes I and II, Federal Information Processing Standards ("PIPS"