Epstein Secrets

elf pointed out, the characteristics of the modus operandi must be "sufficiently idiosyncratic to permit a fair inference of a pattern's existence." United States v. Sliker, 751 F.2d 477, 487 (2d Cir. 1984)); see also United States v. Walla, No. 14—CR- 213 (MICE), 2014 WL 3734522, at *13 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2014

ger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver CO 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 225 Broadway, Suite 715 New York NY 10007 Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00074479 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMEN

entification is tainted by unduly suggestive photo array procedures employed by the Government that violate Ms. Maxwell's right to due process under the United States Constitution for the following reasons: BACKGROUND Accuser 4, was first contacted by the FBI in 2007. was interviewed on August 7, 2007 by Agent

R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim 225 Broadway, Suite 715 New York NY 10007 Phone: Attorneys for Chislaine Maxwell EFTA00090466 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND 1 ARGUMENT 2 i EFTA00090467 TABLES O

it [was] plain that the case fit[ ] into the category of willful misconduct in which the severest sanction [was] appropriate." Id. at 417; see also United States v. Katz, 178 F.3d 368,371-72 (5th Cir. 1999) (government's failure to disclose the "photographs" to the defendant in the identical form it intended

R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim 225 Broadway, Suite 715 New York NY 10007 Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00090451 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ii Table of Authorities iii REL