Epstein Secrets

Southern District of Florida, in violation of Title 18, U.S.C. 1512(d)(1). 2. The defendant agrees and understands that the above charges involve the United States Attorney's Office's and the Federal Bureau of Investigation's own investigation in his conduct, and the conduct of others, between in and around ear

undertake discussion with the State Attorney's Office to ensure compliance with these procedures, which compliance will be necessary to satisfy the United States' interest, pursuant to the Petite policy. By signing this agreement, Epstein asserts and certifies that each of these terms is material to this agre

s District, and the charges against Epstein if any, will be dismissed. IS. After timely fulfilling the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the United Sta agrees that no prosecution will be instituted or initiated against the defendant for any and all criminal Days 8 0+ 12 EFTA00176657 barges which

for conduct subject to this agreement. V‘In -Pla November 5, 2007. ")Epstein shall consent to the plea being entered and sentence imposed by a criUnited States magistrate judge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3401(a). Pursuant—te 18 ALS.C. 4. Epstein shall enter his guilty plea to the federal Information no later

the-anietint of-rostitation-owed-to-eatth-vielint-will-bedetemiined-at-or-beforesentimein& 7.8:- The panics agree to-jointly-recommend pursuant to Fed R. Crim. P. II(010(1(04) that the defendant receive a sentence of eighteen (18) months' imprisonment, to be followed by two one (21) years of supervised re

rol of the government. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evid

t have already been disclosed. 5. We request the results or reports of any physical or mental examination and of any scientific test or experiment. Fed R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(F). 6. We request a written summary of any testimony that the government intends to introduce at trial under Federal Rules of Evidence

rol of the government. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evid

t have already been disclosed. 5. We request the results or reports of any physical or mental examination and of any scientific test or experiment. Fed R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(F). 6. We request a written summary of any testimony that the government intends to introduce at trial under Federal Rules of Evidence

rol of the government. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evid

t have already been disclosed. 5. We request the results or reports of any physical or mental examination and of any scientific test or experiment. Fed R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(F). 6. We request a written summary of any testimony that the government intends to introduce at trial under Federal Rules of Evidence

rol of the government. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evid

t have already been disclosed. 5. We request the results or reports of any physical or mental examination and of any scientific test or experiment. Fed R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(F). 6. We request a written summary of any testimony that the government intends to introduce at trial under Federal Rules of Evidence

rol of the government. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evid

t have already been disclosed. 5. We request the results or reports of any physical or mental examination and of any scientific test or experiment. Fed R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(F). 6. We request a written summary of any testimony that the government intends to introduce at trial under Federal Rules of Evidence

rol of the government. Impeachment evidence, as well as exculpatory evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evid

t have already been disclosed. 5. We request the results or reports of any physical or mental examination and of any scientific test or experiment. Fed R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(F). 6. We request a written summary of any testimony that the government intends to introduce at trial under Federal Rules of Evidence