Epstein Secrets

case 62033DASJI4 Illocorreat59/51 PaSIMI/flint Rae1.2)642 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. IMDCSIMI DOCUMDM ELLCTADMICALIAFMLU DOC': am nun: 11/24/21 (PROPOSED]. PROTECTIVE ORDER 20 Cr. 330

case 62033DASJI4 Illocorreat59/51 PaSIMI/flint Rae1.2)642 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. IMDCSIMI DOCUMDM ELLCTADMICALIAFMLU DOC': am nun: 11/24/21 (PROPOSED]. PROTECTIVE ORDER 20 Cr. 330

case 62033DASJI4 Illocorreat59/51 PaSIMI/flint Rae1.2)642 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. IMDCSIMI DOCUMDM ELLCTADMICALIAFMLU DOC': am nun: 11/24/21 (PROPOSED]. PROTECTIVE ORDER 20 Cr. 330

. PROTECTIVE ORDER 20 Cr. 330 (A.711) ALISON J. NATHAN, United States District Judge: WHEREAS the Court has ordered production of materials from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund to the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(c) (the "Rule 17 Materials") (see Dkt. No. 496); WHEREAS those materials are likely to contain infor

. PROTECTIVE ORDER 20 Cr. 330 (A.711) ALISON J. NATHAN, United States District Judge: WHEREAS the Court has ordered production of materials from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund to the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(c) (the "Rule 17 Materials") (see Dkt. No. 496); WHEREAS those materials are likely to contain infor

Department of Justice by way of the Southern District of New York relating to the sexual abuse of one of Jeffrey Epstein's many victims, Lola Doe.' See United States ex rel. Touhy v. Rages, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). We make this written request pursuant to the Touhy regulations codified as 28 C.F.R. § 16.21 et seq. O

uld interfere with any ongoing law enforcement proceedings. EFTA00104617 September 14, 2021 Page 3 Lola Doe has recently declined an offer from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund and is proceeding to trial in the Southern District of New York. She is simply requesting information in the Government's possession that will assi

the Department of Justice by way of the Southern District of New York relating to the sexual abuse of one of Jeffrey Epstein's many victims, Doe.' See United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). We make this written request pursuant to the Touhy regulations codified as 28 C.F.R. § 16.21 et seq. S

s compiled for law enforcement purposes that would interfere with any ongoing law enforcement proceedings. Doe has recently declined an offer from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund and is proceeding to trial in the Southern District of New York. She is simply requesting information in the Government's possession that will assi

Department of Justice by way of the Southern District of New York relating to the sexual abuse of one of Jeffrey Epstein's many victims, Lola Doe.' See United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951). We make this written request pursuant to the Touhy regulations codified as 28 C.F.R. § 16.21 et seq. O

uld interfere with any ongoing law enforcement proceedings. EFTA00093642 September 14, 2021 Page 3 Lola Doe has recently declined an offer from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund and is proceeding to trial in the Southern District of New York. She is simply requesting information in the Government's possession that will assi