Epstein Secrets

n letxtbrb Perspective Based V0Cin the tnick me of the account ~1 &fount ta. or pØ1 hoe. rine i mere,' endear ch•Ond pcnments may not be subject lo United Slates (US) anda Puerto Rico (PR) interne fats The (bent moniNy interne« is na intended to be used and canna be vald tbeel far lea pir ter. C 'flat shoul

r statement (CaMOM) Lena" Mlormation detailed infarnabon on the inn': lencIng pradkes arid daises" rake to you Clang hatatonshp Agreemat a Amain, Agnew's ard the General Toon and Corokons U3S St ~I aCredit aranaf wolatk agmements andOighoures at say ',en enniaern, inrinant,en Yew Seta Vas *tur

T_015120 “No, | mean my so-called marriage is all image. Pat and | have not, you know, slept together for many years. My God, | was the President of the Unites States, and | couldn’ t even get laid by my own wife.” “Sir, you don’ t really want to talk about this--" “And I’ Il tell you where it started. During the

to the media.” “Well, Hoover once told me—this was right after we won in ‘ 68—he said that within the previous month, LBJ had the FBI put the bug on Agnew and me. Ramsey Clark was attorney general then, but he never authorized it, so that was an ///ega/ wiretap.” “Perfect. We start with Lyndon Johnson

at a sitting president should not be indicted. Far from being authoritative, it was essentially repudiated within months by the Justice Department in the United States' filing in the Supreme Court in United States v. Nixon. Likewise, the most recent opinion—an OLC memo written in 2000includes brief statements that a

cant analysis. The relevant briefs and memoranda are: 1. The Sept. 24, 1973, OLC Dixon memo 2. The Oct. 5, 1973, brief for the United States in In re Agnew 3. The Feb. 12, 1974, memorandum to Independent Counsel Leon Jaworski The June 21, 1974, reply brief for the United States in U.S. v. Nixon 5. The Ma