Epstein Secrets

nded Wellington High School in Palm Beach County. 20. During the period of their involvement with the Defendants, Jane Does # 6, 8 and 12 attended Palm, Beach Central High School in Palm Beach County. 21. During- the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #7 attended William T. Dwyer Hig

t to seek that particular sentence does not change the fact that the sentence was available to the State and rejected in its discretion. Therefore, Petite's presumption that the State of Florida's prior prosecution of Mr. Epstein has vindicated the federal interest cannot be said to have been overcome

secution Agreement stated: "after an investigation of the offenses and Epstein's background, that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure [contained in the Deferred Prosecution Agreement)." See e.g., September 17, 2007 email from M. Vill

TED STATES ORRICA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. A INFORMATION The United States Attorney charges that: COUNT 1 In or around August 2006, in Palm Beach CoF, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ith did knowingly and intentionally violate the privacy prot

greement; and IT APPEARING, after an investigation of the offences and Epstein's background, that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure; THEREFORE, on the authority of It. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern Dis

ED STATES OF RICA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. A INFORMATION The United States Attorney charges that: COUNT I In or around August 2006, in Palm Beach Co , in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ib did knowingly and intentionally violate the privacy pro

91(a)(1),(2); IT APPEARING, after an investigation of the offenses and Epstein's background, that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure; THEREFORE, on the authority of , United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, p

TED STATES ORRICA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. A INFORMATION The United States Attorney charges that: COUNT 1 In or around August 2006, in Palm Beach CoF, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ith did knowingly and intentionally violate the privacy prot

greement; and IT APPEARING, after an investigation of the offences and Epstein's background, that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure; THEREFORE, on the authority of It. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern Dis

RIDA CASE NO. 18 U.S.C. § 403 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(5) A INFORMATION The United States Attorney charges that: COUNT In or around August 2006, in Palm Beach CoF, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, b did knowingly and intentionally violate the privacy protec

Agreement and IT APPEARING, after an investigation of the offenses and Epstein's background, that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure; THEREFORE, on the authority of R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern Dist

TED STATES ORRICA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. A INFORMATION The United States Attorney charges that: COUNT 1 In or around August 2006, in Palm Beach CoF, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ith did knowingly and intentionally violate the privacy prot

greement; and IT APPEARING, after an investigation of the offences and Epstein's background, that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure; THEREFORE, on the authority of It. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern Dis

’s July 2006 arrest on the state indictment, which were contemporaneous with the beginning of the federal investigation, identified him as a wealthy Palm Beach resident with influential contacts, including William Clinton, Donald Trump, Kevin Spacey, and Alan Dershowitz, and other “prominent businessmen, ac

ngle forum in which to proceed to satisfy the substantial federal and state interests involved.” If a substantial question arises as to whether the Petite policy applies to a particular prosecution, the prosecutor should submit the matter to the appropriate Assistant Attorney General for resolution.