Epstein Secrets

s personally and were always different. She was told that when Epstein was in residence he did not want to encounter the Alessis during his stay in Palm Beach• I then spoke with Mr. Alessi in the presence of his attorney, Donnie Murrell. Mr. Alessi stated that he was employed for eleven years with Mr. Eps

oken with .who told her she was interviewed by detectives. During a sworn taped statement, stated she knew that Hadley Robson worked for Jeff in Palm Bead advised she has been there many times for massages. I asked her if she had formal training in providing massages, stated she did not. VINIMMOadvi

ooter broke down. Additionally she received other gifts from Epstein. Epstein also recommended her to another client who resides at Breakers Row in Palm Beach. The client she was referred to was "Glenn" unknown last name, and his wife, who she provided a massages to. The statement was concluded and placed

As all prosecutors know, there are no perfect witnesses. Particularly in cases involving exploited children, as one member of your defense team, Ms. Thacker, surely knows from her work at CEOS, it is not uncommon for victim-witnesses to give conflicting statements. The prosecutors are in the best positi

dants = a/k/a ' and to perform, among other things, services as personal assistants. 2. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at Palm Beach, Florida, in the Southern District of Florida. EFTA01718439 3. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN was the principal owner ofJEGE, INC., a Delaware corpor

e nunnal lintetittnitt!! and rehede lint of state itidit.i.ill matters. II rennin:: thtit Mr. 1.:TINItir:-> courlsti persuade the State Att,riley of Palm Beach Iv istue a criminal information EFTA01718497 vu, us, U. tr). A, :514 r CIII.*:'::20eS 1? i t PAW • GAIAAJLAVE urrium owitowse SIU1.14 6200 41

As all prosecutors know, there are no perfect witnesses. Particularly in cases involving exploited children, as one member of your defense team, Ms. Thacker, surely knows from her work at CEOS, it is not uncommon for victim-witnesses to give conflicting statements. The prosecutors are in the best positi

this matter, before I had any knowledge of defense counsel objections, I sua sponte proposed the Addendum to Mr. LeOcowitz at an October meeting in Paint Beach. I did this in an attempt to avoid what I foresaw would likely be a litigious selection process. It was only slier I proposed this change that Mr.

ex offender and a method of compensation.' Furthermore, and significantly, Epstein agreed that he had the burden of ensuring compliance of the :Ms. Thacker had recently resigned from CEOS as a Trial Attorney and entered private practice. 9 Specifically, the Agreement mandates, inter alia, (I) a guilty p

personal matters and contacts to which he attends in Florida. For example, beginning in 2002, Mr. Epstein visited his mother nearly every weekend in Palm Beach until she passed away in April, 2004. 5 As previously set forth herein, and as more fully explained in other submissions related to this case, the r

bmissions include: a summary of the irregularities and misconduct that occurred during the federal investigation; a letter from former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS's assessment of its limited review of Mr. E stein's case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Atto

B FL 601 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave, 4th Floor West Pala Beach, Florida 33401 (564) 820-8731 Facsimile (561) 820-8777 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET TO: Gerald Lefcourt, Esq. DATE: August 16,2007 | ‘FAXNO. _232-988.6192 g

As all prosecutors know, there are no perfect witnesses. Particularly in Cases involving exploited children, as one member of your defense team, Ms, Thacker, surely knows from her work at CEOS, it is not uncommon for victim-witnesses to give conflicting statements. The prosecutors are in the best position