Epstein Secrets

f the evidence that transfer is necessary. In re Charles Schwab & Co. Sec. Litig., 69 F.Supp.2d 734,735

rder, the proceedings should be stayed pending the adjudication of the first-filed action. (sac) (Entered: 10/16/2002) 10/09/2002 13 AFFIDAVIT of Dayle Davison by Citibank, N.A. in opposition to [7-1] motion for an order, pun. to Rules 1, 12 and 13(a) of the FRCP, dismissing the Complaint, [7-2] motion for

f the evidence that transfer is necessary. In re Charles Schwab & Co. Sec. Litig., 69 F. Supp. 2d 734, 73

(Count V). The plaintiffs seek rescission of the promissory note and punitive damages (Counts VI and VII). (Am. Compl. III 45-68.) In April 1999, Dayle Davison ["Davison"], Vice President of Citibank in New York and Epstein's private banker, and other Citibank employees telephoned Epstein while he was in t

EFFREY LAMONT LARRY DENSON 15 EPSTEIN, JEFFREY CHARLES L SUEY 16 EPSTEIN, JEFFREY *Download( paes S 0

that defendants were acting in plaintiffs' best interests. For example, it is alleged that in conversations between April 29, 1999 and May 2, 1999, Dayle Davison, a Vice President of Citibank in the Private Banking Division, called Epstein to introduce him to an "exceptional investment opportunity." (Compl.