Epstein Secrets

December 2011-February 2012. April 2012-May 2012: Charles Schwab IRA statemeNs for November 2012-December

ssue for trial unless there is sufficient evidence favoring the non- moving party for a jury to return a verdict for that party." Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249, 106 S. Ct. 2505, 91 L. Ed. 2d 202 (1986). [HN14] "[Alt the summary judgment stage the judge's function is not himself to weigh

a status conference in this matter. Copies to: Charles H. Lichtman, Esq. Issac Marcushamer, Esq. Jason

ercome the motion, and the court must analyze "the evidence presented through the prism of the substantive evidentiary burden." Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 254 (1986). UNDISPUTED FACTS Nearly all facts relating to the Plaintiff's prima facie case are undisputed. The facts in this case c

& Berland, Berkeley, CA, for Defendants. ORDER CHARLES R. BREYER, J. *1 Now pending before the Court is

l if proof of its existence or nonexistence might affect the outcome of the suit under the applicable substantive law. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505. 91 L.Ed2d 202 (1986). Where there is no material fact in dis- pute, the moving party need only establish that