Epstein Secrets

16/2009 409 RESPONSE to Motion re 405 MOTION Order for the preservation of evidence filed by Herbert Stettin. Replies due by 11/27/2009. (Lichtman, Charles) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 410 RESPONSE/REPLY Epstein's Response in Opposition to Jane Doe No. 4's Motion for Protective Order as to the Sc

5 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale , FL 33301 USA ti EFTA01660040 Jane Doe No. 102 Consol Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 101 Consol Plaintiff Jane Doe II Consol Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 6 Consol Plaintiff Katherine Warthen Ezell LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg et al

? 7 Q. And then that was that? 8 MR. PIKE: Fonn. 8 A. That was it. 9 THE WITNESS: I had taken a week vacation. 9 Q. Do you know a man named Charles or Gerald 10 BY MR. GARCIA: 10 Goldsmith? He ran for mayor or something. 11 Q. Was there any followup after Detective Dawson 11. A. Yeah, I k

rect. 17 Q. Did any other witnesses that you can recall 18 express similar concerns about being followed or being 19 investigated? 20 A. Yes. Jane Doe II. I had received several 21 text messages and phone calls indicating similar, where 22 Pls were speaking to her friends, her family, previous 23

6/2009 409 RESPONSE to Motion re 405 MOTION Order for the preservation of evidence filed by Herbert Stettin. Replies due by 11/27/2009. (Lichtman. Charles) (Entered: 11/16/2009) 11/16/2009 410 RESPONSE/REPLY Epstein's Response in Opposition to Jane Doe No. 4's Motion for Protective Order as to the S

: Other Docket: Jurisdiction: 03/24/2009 Judge Kenneth A Marra Personal Injury (360) Federal Question None None Federal Question Litigants Jane Doe II Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein Defendant Class Code: CLOSED Closed: Yes Statute: 28:1331 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Demand Amount: $0 NOS Description