Epstein Secrets

Monday. Thanks for your assistance. From: Gross, Charles R. (SMO) Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2011 3:40

or be brought in as a necessary party, and defend the Non-Prosecution Agreement. I told them this would have to be approved by the U.S. Attorney and Main Justice. I have serious misgivings about not defending the Executive Branch's prerogative to engage in a Non- Prosecution Agreement, free from supervision o

ttlement discussions, even if not privileged. See Charles E. Hill & Associates, Inc. v. ABT Electronics, I

d these statements have frequently been based on discovery materials. See, e.g., Attorneys Say Miami Prosecutors Violated Crime Victims' Rights Act, Main Justice, March 22, 2011 (quoting Plaintiffs' motion asserting that the U.S. Attorney's Office "deliberately misled' them and claiming that the "only reason

ttlement discussions, even if not privileged. See Charles E. Hill & Associates, Inc. I. ABT Electronics, I

d these statements have frequently been based on discovery materials. See, e.g., Attorneys Say Miami Prosecutors Violated Crime Victims' Rights Act, Main Justice, March 22, 2011 (quoting Plaintiffs' motion asserting that the U.S. Attorney's Office "deliberately misled' them and claiming that the "only reason