Epstein Secrets

t, on November 28, 2018 and on December 3, 2018 — very soon after the publication of a 3-part investigative report in the Miami Herald (authored by Julie K. Brown) relating to Mr. Epstein's Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement, dated September 24, 2007 — Mr. Epstein paid $100,000 to "a company founded and run by

report in the Miami Herald (authored by Julie K. Brown) relating to Mr. Epstein's Florida Non-Prosecutio

ographs of young-looking women or girls," which were recently uncovered during the July 6-7, 2019, search of Mr. Epstein's East 71st Street mansion. ica Dkt. 11, Ex. 1 at 9. The search results suggest the "possibility that defendant could target another vulnerable victim." See United States v. Baker, 34

t, on November 28, 2018 and on December 3, 2018 — very soon after the publication of a 3-part investigative report in the Miami Herald (authored by Julie K. Brown) relating to Mr. Epstein's Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement, dated September 24, 2007 — Mr. Epstein paid $100,000 to "a company founded and run by

report in the Miami Herald (authored by Julie K. Brown) relating to Mr. Epstein's Florida Non-Prosecutio

ographs of young-looking women or girls," which were recently uncovered during the July 6-7, 2019, search of Mr. Epstein's East 71st Street mansion. ica Dkt. 11, Ex. 1 at 9. The search results suggest the "possibility that defendant could target another vulnerable victim." See United States v. Baker, 34

report in the Miami Herald (authored by Julie K. Brown) relating to Mr. Epstein's Florida Non-Prosecutio

t, on November 28, 2018 and on December 3, 2018 — very soon after the publication of a 3-part investigative report in the Miami Herald (authored by Julie K. Brown) relating to Mr. Epstein's Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement, dated September 24, 2007 — Mr. Epstein paid $100,000 to "a company founded and run by

ographs of young-looking women or girls," which were recently uncovered during the July 6-7, 2019, search of Mr. Epstein's East 71st Street mansion. ica Dkt. 11, Ex. 1 at 9. The search results suggest the "possibility that defendant could target another vulnerable victim." See United States v. Baker, 34