Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mental informant. Id. The burden to even obtain a Franks hearing is a heavy one, and such hearings are thus exceedingly rare. See United States v. Brown, 744 F. Supp. 558, 567 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) ("A defendant seeking to have the Court hold a Franks hearing bears a substantial burden."); United States v
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mental informant. Id. The burden to even obtain a Franks hearing is a heavy one, and such hearings are thus exceedingly rare. See United States v. Brown, 744 F. Supp. 558, 567 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) ("A defendant seeking to have the Court hold a Franks hearing bears a substantial burden."); United States v
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mental informant. Id. The burden to even obtain a Franks hearing is a heavy one, and such hearings are thus exceedingly rare. See United States v. Brown, 744 F. Supp. 558, 567 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) ("A defendant seeking to have the Court hold a Franks hearing bears a substantial burden."); United States v
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mental informant. Id. The burden to even obtain a Franks hearing is a heavy one, and such hearings are thus exceedingly rare. See United States v. Brown, 744 F. Supp. 558, 567 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) ("A defendant seeking to have the Court hold a Franks hearing bears a substantial burden."); United States v
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Julie K. Brown and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON2,390 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON724 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION494 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
Stephen Hawking
PERSON390 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON376 w/ Julie·2 w/ N.Y.
Michael Jackson
PERSON331 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
George Mitchell
PERSON329 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON317 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON260 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
the Southern District
LOCATION242 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON236 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION235 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
Colorado
LOCATION217 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON212 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
Michigan
LOCATION207 w/ Julie·3 w/ N.Y.
DB
Doug Band
PERSON177 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON173 w/ Julie·3 w/ N.Y.
Chris Tucker
PERSON166 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
Bill Richardson
PERSON166 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.
Minnesota
LOCATION164 w/ Julie·4 w/ N.Y.