Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mental informant. Id. The burden to even obtain a Franks hearing is a heavy one, and such hearings are thus exceedingly rare. See United States v. Brown, 744 F. Supp. 558, 567 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) ("A defendant seeking to have the Court hold a Franks hearing bears a substantial burden."); United States v
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature ofcell phone location records," which
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mental informant. Id. The burden to even obtain a Franks hearing is a heavy one, and such hearings are thus exceedingly rare. See United States v. Brown, 744 F. Supp. 558, 567 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) ("A defendant seeking to have the Court hold a Franks hearing bears a substantial burden."); United States v
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mental informant. Id. The burden to even obtain a Franks hearing is a heavy one, and such hearings are thus exceedingly rare. See United States v. Brown, 744 F. Supp. 558, 567 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) ("A defendant seeking to have the Court hold a Franks hearing bears a substantial burden."); United States v
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
mental informant. Id. The burden to even obtain a Franks hearing is a heavy one, and such hearings are thus exceedingly rare. See United States v. Brown, 744 F. Supp. 558, 567 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) ("A defendant seeking to have the Court hold a Franks hearing bears a substantial burden."); United States v
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Julie K. Brown and the Carpenter Court
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON2,390 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON724 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
United States
LOCATION494 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
Stephen Hawking
PERSON390 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON376 w/ Julie·2 w/ the
Michael Jackson
PERSON331 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
George Mitchell
PERSON329 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON317 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON260 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION242 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON236 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION235 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
Colorado
LOCATION217 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON212 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
Michigan
LOCATION207 w/ Julie·3 w/ the
DB
Doug Band
PERSON177 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON173 w/ Julie·3 w/ the
Chris Tucker
PERSON166 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
Bill Richardson
PERSON166 w/ Julie·4 w/ the
Minnesota
LOCATION164 w/ Julie·4 w/ the