Epstein Secrets

13 A. Yes. 14 Q. What's his last name? 15 A. Brown. 16 Q. They — looks like theres a — was it a 1

have to be the Jane Doe; Jane Doe? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. Are you aware of any individuals that Miss - 7 Mr. Edwards represents, other than you, a and E.W.? 8 A. No. 9 Q. All right. Then it goes down — again, 1 10 take you back where it says: "Jane Doe was identified 11. via the FBI's investigati

25 Federal, local, that you had been to Mr. Er:stain's home; Page 136 Q. Okay. would be -- 2 A. Yes. 3 Q. — you would assume. C.W. would be E.W., and 4 you would have to be the Jane Doe; Jane Doe? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. Are you aware of any individuals that Miss - 7 Mr. Edwards represents, oth

19 Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972) 23 Brown & Williamson Tobacco CS E. v. Wigand, 1996 WL 35

accurate misdescription. Nowhere in his complaint in the Ponzi Scheme Action does Epstein allege that the sex abuse suits brought by Jane Doe,. and E.W. were fabricated. Instead, what the complaint actually alleges is that Rothstein used 9 DWI 1584534543 3970112.000042 EFTA00596463 these three le

minors); id. at 7 ("the evidence of Epstein's crimes is now clear"). Among the many other evidentiary sources listed by Edwards: • Jane Doe,.. and E.W. have all provided graphic eyewitness testimony that they were sexually abused by Epstein when minors. See SUF ¶ 2 ("Deposition of Jane Doe, Septemb

y v. Colby, 976 So. 2d 31 (Ha. 2d DCA 2008) 10 Brown Distributing Co. of West Palm Beach v. Marcel, 86

was entitled to see the nonprosecution agreement in cases other than the one immediately before it. Back in state court, one of Epstein's victims, E.W., intervened in the criminal case and moved to vacate the order sealing the nonprosecution agreement. (A-10). E.W. argued that the agreement was imp

that it is pointless to keep the document sealed in state court. (A-11, p. 4). The trial court held a hearing on the motions to intervene filed by E.W. and the Post. (Respondent B.B.'s Appendix ("RA")). The judge advised the parties that it did not appear the proper procedures were followed with re

t not sound like a big deal, but Genevieve Shaw Brown, se- nior editor at the online travel Web site,

th to do so today. "It is against public policy for these documents to have been sealed and hidden from public scrutiny. As a member of the public, E.W. has the right to have these documents unsealed," wrote former Circuit Judge Bill Berger, now in private practice and representing one of the women.