Epstein Secrets

set out the basis for its conclusions in such a way to permit meaningful review of its decision. In reviewing similar cases in other circuits, the Richardson court noted that [HN4] " '[d]ismissal typically occurs in cases showing consistently dilatory conduct or the complete failure to take any steps oth

again for dismissal of this appeal for lack of prosecution. North Shore has not filed an opposition. II. DISCUSSION II-IN1] "Under Rule 8001(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the District Court is empowered to dismiss an appeal for failure to prosecute or otherwise follow the procedures set out in the Bankruptcy Rules."

set out the basis for its conclusions in such a way to permit meaningful review of its decision. In reviewing similar cases in other circuits, the Richardson court noted that [HN4)" '[d]ismissal typically occurs in cases showing consistently dilatory conduct or the complete failure to take any steps othe

for failure to prosecute. In that case, the district court dismissed a creditor's appeal with prejudice for failure to comply with the mandates of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. In so doing, the district court considered only two of the six Poulis factors: the creditor's bad faith in requesting a second extension of time i

rocedures set out in the Bankruptcy Rules." In re Richardson Industrial Contractors, Inc., 189 Fed. Appx. 93,

es again for dismissal of this appeal for lack of prosecution. North Shore has not filed an opposition. II DISCUSSION [HN1j "Under Rule 8001(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the District Court is empowered to dismiss an appeal for failure to prosecute or otherwise follow the procedures set out in the Bankruptcy Rules."