Epstein Secrets

DEA Special Agents and state and local law enforcement officers), aff'd per curiam, No. 10-5068, 2010 WL 3521595, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 3, 2010); Richardson v. DOJ, 730 F.Supp.2d 225, 236 (D. D.C.2010) ("[T]he EOUSA properly [withheld] the identities of and personal information about all the third parti

airly be characterized as an enforcement proceeding." Shapiro v. U.S. Dep't ofJustice, 37 F. Supp. 3d 7, 29 (D.D.C. 2014) (quotation marks omitted). The Tenth Circuit has adopted a "per se rule" that "for an agency like the FBI, whose primary function is law enforcement, all records and information it compiles ar

in one of the Oklahoma City bombing prosecutions, the Tenth Circuit rebuked a trial judge for permitting an attorney

or sentencing") (discussed at infra notes 524-539 and accompanying text). 475, United States v. Cowan, 524 F.2d 504, 513 (Sth Cir. 1975). 476 In re Richards, 213 F.3d 773, 787 (3d Cir. 2000); see also United States v. Hamm, 659 F.2d 624, 629-30 (Sth Cir. 1981). 417 Accord United States v. Heaton, 458 F.

BREAK --- Page 7 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *846 The victims subsequently filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeking review of the district court's ruling. *4 Three months later, a Tenth Circuit panel rejected the victims' claims. >> The circuit found "a num

release of the defendant "will endanger the safety of any other person"). 329 United States v. Cowan, 524 F.2d 504, 513 (Sth Cir. 1975). 330 In re Richards, 213 F.3d 773, 787 (3d Cir. 2000). DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017762 --- PAGE BREAK --- Page 49 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *919 (c) Victim'