Epstein Secrets

us B. Lau, White & Case LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee Stolt—Nielsen S.A. and Stott- Nielsen Transportation Group Ltd. Roberta D. Liebenberg, Allen D. Black, (Argued), Gerard A. Dever, Fine, Kaplan & Black, Philadelphia, PA, James A. Back- strom, Jr., Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee Richard B. Wingfield

ation Group Ltd. Roberta D. Liebenberg, Allen D. Black, (Argued), Gerard A. Dever, Fine, Kaplan & Blac

69 (D.C.Cir.1987) (citing Younger Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.O. 746, 27 L.Ed.2 669 (1971)). The district court correctly held that, if indicted, Miranda can protect his rights under the First Amendment and Speech or Debate Clause pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. F.

ument that he is entitled to declaratory relief under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, is likewise unavailing. While it is true, as Miranda states, that an adequate remedy at law does not preclude declaratory relief if such relief is otherwise appropriate, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 57, the

hite St. Louis Police Officers Accused Of Beating Black Officer. • Prosecutors Charge Two NYC Mortuary W

system." The AP (3/30) also covers this story. EFTA00150612 Texas Man Pleads Guilty In Meth Case. In website coverage, KETK-TV Tyler, TX (3/30, Miranda) reports Texas resident Christopher Marcell Mumphrey has "pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine." Acting US Attorn

ement. You never asked for such a term. During an earlier EFTA01718574 JAY P. LEFKOW1TZ„ ESQ. DECEMBER 1 1, 2007 PAGE 4 OF 5 meeting, where Mr. Black was present, he raised the concern that you now voice. Mr. Black and I did not have a chance to discuss the issue, but I had already conceived of a

, 125 S. Ct. 1338 (2006), opinion reinstated by, 144 Fed. Appx.104 (2005); United States v. Ortega, 363 F.3d 1093 (11th Cir. 2004); United States v. Miranda, 348 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2003); MnitedstagLy,namga 195 F.3d 640 (1 'Cir. 1999); United States v.Panfll 338 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir. 2003); United Sta

ald B. Lefcourt cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. Alan I )ershowit, EFTA01660187

. 2004),judgment vacated for Booker consideration, 125 S. Ct. 1338 (2006); United States v. Orrega, 363 F.3d 1093 (11th Cir. 2004); United States v. Miranda, 348 F.3d 1322 (I 1* Cir. 2003); United States v. Tillmon, 195 F.3d 640 (I I* Cir. 1999); United States v. Poe!, supra, 338 F.3d 1299 (11* Cir. 200

Alan Dershowitz cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq. Roy Black, Esq. EFTA00284197 Tab A EFTA00284198 STEVE

r. 2004),judgment varied for Booker consideration, 125 S. Ct. 1338 (2006); United States v. Orrega, 363 F.3d 1093 (11th Cir. 2004); United States v. Miranda, 348 F.3d 1322 (11° Cir. 2003); United States v. Tillmon, 195 F.3d 640 (11th Cir. 1999); United States v. Panfll, supra, 338 F.3d 1299 (11° Cir. 20

atthew (USAFLS) Cc: Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi Matt - I had hoped to have a revised indictment for our discussion today but Mr. Black's motion has demanded my immediate attention. However, in advance of our meeting this afternoon, I wanted to let you know my thoughts about some of

stitutionality of 2422(b) & his sentence. Court affirmed both conviction & sentence. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting U.S. I Miranda, 348 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2003) Internet Sting Internet chat room; conversations about having sex with "13 yr-old"; arranged to meet for sex;