Epstein Secrets

-- Original message — From: Jeff Fuller Date:11/12/2014 11:49 (GMT-05:00) To: Jean Luc Brunel Subject: RE: New York Jean Luc, I am really sorry you feel so bad and I know it has been a mental and psychological frustration. As you know I ch

-- Original message — From: Jeff Fuller Date:11/12/2014 11:49 (GMT-05:00) To: Jean Luc Brunel Subject: RE: New York Jean Luc, I am really sorry you feel so bad and I know it has been a mental and psychological frustration. As you know I chose to partner with you due to yo

Date:11/12/2014 11:49 (GMT-05:00) To: Jean Luc Brunel Subject: RE: New York Jean Luc, I am really so

ller Date:11/12/2014 11:49 (GMT-05:00) To: Jean Luc Brunel Subject: RE: New York Jean Luc, I am really so

rries from our clients that we are vendors for that are large American corporations likes Kohls, JC Penney, Sears, Nordstrom, Target, Neiman Marcus, Macys, Saks, Belk, and so forth that require vendor agreements and for us to be considered an upstanding company. It really worries me as some of those c

—--- Original message —-—— From: Jeff Fuller Date: 11/12/2014 11:49 (GMT-05:00) To: Jean Lue Brunel Subject: RE: New York fean Lue, lam really sorry you feel so bad and { know it has been a mental and psychological frustration. As you know | chos

Date: 11/12/2014 11:49 (GMT-05:00) To: Jean Lue Brunel Subject: RE: New York fean Lue, lam really sor

orries from our clients that we are vendors for that are large American corporations likes Kohls, JC Penney, Sears, Nordstrom, Target, Neiman Marcus, Macys, Saks, Belk, and so forth that require vendor agreements and for us to be considered an upstanding company. It really worries me as some of those com

calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03672-03673 06/26/2009 Wayne Black Bradley Edwards Brunel information Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible eviden

an BATES DATE LQ FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION protected by privacy rights 06118-06146 09/15/2009 Seth Lehrman Bradley Edwards Farnsworth v. Macys case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr