Epstein Secrets

IVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DAMAGES PLED IN BRADLEY EDWARDS' SECON

um Of Law In Opposition To Damages Pled In Bradley Edwards' Second Amended Counterclaim, and states as follows: In his Second Amended Counterclaim, Edwards seeks the following damages from Epstein for alleged abuse of process: injury to Edwards' reputation, "interference in his professional relationshi

0XXXXMBAG CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via G Email, G Facsimile, G U.S. Mail, G Hand Delivery, G Federal Express this day of April, 2012 to: Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach

IVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DAMAGES PLED IN BRA

m Of Law In Opposition To Damages Pled In Bradley Edwards' Second Amended Counterclaim, and states as follows: In his Second Amended Counterclaim, Edwards seeks the following damages from Epstein for alleged abuse of process: injury to reputation, "interference in his professional relationships, the l

stricken. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via G Email, G Facsimile, G U.S. Mail, G Hand Delivery, G Federal Express this day of April, 2012 to: Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, 2139 Palm Beach Lake

FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files

tein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against the Defendants, Scott Rothstein, ("Rothstein") and Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") (collectively referred to as "Defendants") and alleges: INTRODUCTION This litigation has at its core a law firm that has been described by a Unit

Complaint CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via G Email, G Facsimile, G U.S. Mail, G Hand Delivery, G Federal Express this day of August, 2011: Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach La

FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files

tein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against the Defendants, Scott Rothstein, ("Rothstein") and Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") (collectively referred to as "Defendants") and alleges: INTRODUCTION This litigation has at its core a law firm that has been described by a Unit

Complaint CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been duly furnished via G Email, G Facsimile, G U.S. Mail, G Hand Delivery, G Federal Express this day of August, 2011: Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach La