Epstein Secrets

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408

ry responses responsive to Epstein's Requests. In support thereof, Epstein states: I Them are still outstanding damages discovery requests to which Edwards's Response is not due until after the Court's deadline date for the filing of this Motion. As such, an additional Motion may be required upon receip

ANSWER: Objection. Irrelevant, immaterial, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and an unwarranted invasion of Bradley Edwards' right to economic privacy. 15. State the amount of gross income that you received from the provision of goods or services other than while acting a

y apparent, production of the 6 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00799386 requested information is required. Calderbank v. Cazares, 435 So.2d 377 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Specifically, Edwards has sued Epstein for Malicious Prosecution, and as a result is claiming damages, includin

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408

ry responses responsive to Epstein's Requests. In support thereof, Epstein states: I Them are still outstanding damages discovery requests to which Edwards's Response is not due until after the Court's deadline date for the filing of this Motion. As such, an additional Motion may be required upon receip

ANSWER: Objection. Irrelevant, immaterial, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and an unwarranted invasion of Bradley Edwards' right to economic privacy. 15. State the amount of gross income that you received from the provision of goods or services other than while acting a

y apparent, production of the 6 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585357 requested information is required. Calderbank v. Cazares, 435 So.2d 377 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Specifically, Edwards has sued Epstein for Malicious Prosecution, and as a result is claiming damages, includin

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408

ry responses responsive to Epstein's Requests. In support thereof, Epstein states: I Them are still outstanding damages discovery requests to which Edwards's Response is not due until after the Court's deadline date for the filing of this Motion. As such, an additional Motion may be required upon receip

ANSWER: Objection. Irrelevant, immaterial, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and an unwarranted invasion of Bradley Edwards' right to economic privacy. 15. State the amount of gross income that you received from the provision of goods or services other than while acting a

ly apparent, production of the 6 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE Th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585378 requested information is required. Calderbank v. Cazares, 435 So.2d 377 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Specifically, Edwards has sued Epstein for Malicious Prosecution, and as a result is claiming damages, includin