Epstein Secrets

1-2/28/11 LAS $ 4,155.00 03/04/11 Prose Court Reporting Agency, Inc.; Invoice# 6963 dated 3/4/2011 - Service re: Create/Edit Video Deposition of Bradley J Edwards LAS $ 80.00 03/10/11 United Reporting, Inc.; Invoice# 78543 dated 3/10/2011 - Service re: Deposition of AJ Discala CEK $ 95.00 03/11/11 Will

2011 Page 2 12/27/10 Compass Investigations; Invoice# 2010010088 dated 12/27/2010 - Service of Subpoena to Gary Farmer @ Fanner Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman PL LAS $ 76.00 12/30/10 Compass Investigations; Invoice# 2010010089 dated 12/30/2010 - Service of Subpoena to Dean Kretschmar

eissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman PL LAS $ 76.00 12/30/10 Compass Investigations; Invoice# 2010010089 dated 12/30/2010 - Service of Subpoena to Dean Kretschmar LAS $ 76.00 12/30/10 Compass Investigations; Invoice# 2010010090 dated 12/30/2010 - Service of Subpoena to Debra Vilegas Clewiston FL LAS $ 18

FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files

tein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against the Defendants, Scott Rothstein, ("Rothstein") and Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") (collectively referred to as "Defendants") and alleges: INTRODUCTION This litigation has at its core a law firm that has been described by a Unit

ten and Jenne brought in the case files for the Epstein Actions, which numbered as many as nineteen (19) boxes. 16. On or about October 13, 2009, Dean Kretschmar ("Kretschmar"), a representative of one of the investor groups, was encouraged by Rothstein, in a meeting with other partners of RRA, to look at th

FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files

tein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against the Defendants, Scott Rothstein, ("Rothstein") and Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") (collectively referred to as "Defendants") and alleges: INTRODUCTION This litigation has at its core a law firm that has been described by a Unit

802-9044 EFTA00584215 Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Second Amended Complaint 16. On or about October 13, 2009, Dean Kretschmar ("Kretschmar"), a representative of one of the investor groups, was encouraged by Rothstein, in a meeting with other partners of RRA, to look at th

FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, f

through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against the Defendants, Scott Rothstein, individually ("Rothstein"), and Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), individually. The Plaintiff alleges as follows: GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 1. The Plaintiff is an individual who resides in Palm Beach County, Florida

stein directed that Fisten and Jenne bring into his office the case files for the Epstein Actions which numbered approximately nineteen (19) boxes. Dean Kretschmar, ("Kretschmar"), a representative of one of the investment companies was permitted by Rothstein to review the case files of RRA against Epstein. 16