Epstein Secrets

stand. 13 order that he entered. And I'll quote fron it. I) Good afternoon. Jack Goldberger on behalf of la This is Order on Counter-plaintiff Bradley Edwards' la Mr. Epstein. 14 Motion to Deternine Status of Punitive Damage IS Your Honor, as a general statement of the lax, Is Discovery and Applicabi

Y EDWARDS, individually, , going to hoar? boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs. 10 THE COURT: Yes. My understanding as I left / 11 Was going to be Edwards' Second Supplement to TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS 12 Motion in Lunine Addressing Scope of Admissible I) Evidence, and of course in that same vein

uct privileged 14 bearing the expense to turn these docunents over to is materials. So Judge Carney was appointed a special IS Earner Jaffe and Bred Edwards for purposes of it master to make a determination as to what should 16 preparing a privilege log. 17 and could be turned over and report back t

ding this. I Combine Investments versus Rothstein. 0 believe that prejudice outweighs any, any value it I Interestingly, a natter related to the Ponsi a might have, any relevance in this action, because , schma. 10 he needs co show damages proximately caused and not 10 And those two eases to

stand. 13 order that he entered. And I'll quote fron it. I) Good afternoon. Jack Goldberger on behalf of la This is Order on Counter-plaintiff Bradley Edwards' la Mr. Epstein. 14 Motion to Deternine Status of Punitive Damage IS Your Honor, as a general statement of the lax, Is Discovery and Applicabi

last wok just 4 and Any Reference to Docunenta Containing 4 So my suggestion to your Honor is that wo deal 5 Privileged Materials, Listed on Edwards' Privilege o first with the procedural issue because, as I said, 4 Log. 4 that will narrow issue. significantly. And then / MR. SCAROER: Yes,

uct privileged 14 bearing the expense to turn these docunents over to is materials. So Judge Carney was appointed a special IS Earner Jaffe and Bred Edwards for purposes of it master to make a determination as to what should 16 preparing a privilege log. 17 and could be turned over and report back t

ding this. I Combine Investments versus Rothstein. 0 believe that prejudice outweighs any, any value it I Interestingly, a natter related to the Ponsi a might have, any relevance in this action, because , schma. 10 he needs co show damages proximately caused and not 10 And those two eases to

amination by Mr. Lick SS Vs. 7 Redirect Examination by Mr. Scarola 131 SCOTT 0.0TNSTBIN, individually; 0 Rocones-Exaninatien by Mr. Lick 138 BRADLEY EDWARDS, Individually, 9 Further Redirect Examination by Mr. Scarola 160 Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. 10 Certificate of Oath 170 / 11 Certificate

5 5 Berger in the matter of Jeffrey 5 APPEARANCES: 6 For Plaintiff: 4 Epstein versus Scott Rothstein and Bradley 7 LINK 4 ROCKENBACH, . Edwards. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 0 9 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE , This deposition is being hold 2255 Glad

would moan -- for example, 1 when you aay -- it wasn't during the time of the 2 Mr. Scarola's firm represented a client against 2 Rothstein -- Brad Edward➢ wasn't working for the ) Mr. Epstein, right? ) Rothstein firm, I don't believe, when this happened. 4 A Correct. 4 Q When he settled? 5 Q

hree child victims? A No. Q Dld there coma a tine when you learned that Rothstein had used the cases that we have been referring to to attract Ponsi schema investor➢? A I learned that sometime in the beginning of November of 2009 by -- , by reading it in the paper. Q prior to that tine, w

iff/Counter-Defendant, vs. 4 the court. It has caused me to have to SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; 7 engage in an inordinate amount of time to BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, 8 the exclusion of other natters that needed Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. 4 my attention. 10 While the Court understands the

thank Hr. Cassell for being here today. Your Honor, this is Mr. Epstein's motion to remove this case from the trial docket. It was prompted by Mr. Edwards' motion to separate the trials, which was motion -- for the obvious reason, when he • filed his motion to sot the case in the above-styled cause

ou 23 the difference. 23 can't fix today what was wrong in May, 24 If I put his language In, which tied it 24 that's the problem. 25 to the Ponsi scheme, be wouldn't have added 25 THE COURT: The pretrial stipulation, Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00793892 2 3 4 5