Epstein Secrets

a, Es.. Jack Goldber er, Es.. Marc Nurik, Es . Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Fred Haddad E, . Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire

el, hereby files this Motion for an enlargement of time within which to Respond to Motions filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") and to continue the hearing set by the Court in this matter on October 3, 2017. In support thereof, Epstein states: INTRODUCTIQN On September 15

ditional Motions as contemplated by this Court on September 25, 2017; to wit: his Omnibus Motion in Limine; a Motion to Compel discovery related to Edwards's Privilege Log; a Motion to Compel responses to Discovery; and a Motion to Compel answers to questions posed to Edwards in his depositions. Edwards filed the follo

TY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, CASE NO.: 502009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. JUDGE: HAFELE SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT/

el, hereby files this Motion for an enlargement of time within which to Respond to Motions filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") and to continue the hearing set by the Court in this matter on October 3, 2017. In support thereof, Epstein states: INTRODUCTION On September 15

ditional Motions as contemplated by this Court on September 25, 2017; to wit: his Omnibus Motion in Limine; a Motion to Compel discovery related to Edwards's Privilege Log; a Motion to Compel responses to Discovery; and a Motion to Compel answers to questions posed to Edwards in his depositions. Edwards filed the follo

TY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, CASE NO.: 502009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. JUDGE: HAFELE SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT/

el, hereby files this Motion for an enlargement of time within which to Respond to Motions filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") and to continue the hearing set by the Court in this matter on October 3, 2017. In support thereof, Epstein states: INTRODUCTION On September 15

ditional Motions as contemplated by this Court on September 25, 2017; to wit: his Omnibus Motion in Limine; a Motion to Compel discovery related to Edwards's Privilege Log; a Motion to Compel responses to Discovery; and a Motion to Compel answers to questions posed to Edwards in his depositions. Edwards filed the follo