Epstein Secrets

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045-02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the di

Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE 11Q FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; prote

d not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01973-01974 07/23/2009 Mike Fisten Bradley J. Edwards CMA vs. Epstein — new investigator info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the

assell Motion to Supplement with the Work product; attorney/client privilege; 124 EFTA00602958 Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissine. Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION Visoski depo irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the dis

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045.02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to th

Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 03550-03574 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy W/P;

d not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01973-01974 07/23/2009 Mike Fisten Bradley J. Edwards CMA vs. Epstein — new investigator info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the

t; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead 113 EFTA00310160 Privilege bag— Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissine, Edwards. Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE m FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights

ERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Roy Black, Esq. Farmer. Jaffe. Weissine. Jackie Perczek, Es . Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Att

istrict Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Roy Black, Esq. Farmer. Jaffe. Weissine.

e No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Roy Black, Esq. Farmer. Jaffe. Weissine. Jackie Perczek, Es . Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe # I and Jane Doe # 2 3 Mart