Epstein Secrets

ell c To: Jackie Perczek < Cc: USAFLS , "Brad Edwards InSAFLS)" Subject: RE: Position on Motion to Tr

From: Paul Cassell c To: Jackie Perczek < Cc: USAFLS , "Brad Edwards InSAFLS)" Subject: RE: Position on Motion to Treat MTD as Equivalent to Jurisdictional Question Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 18:11:02 +0000 Importance:

for the filing of our brief while a contested (and, in our view, meritorious) jurisdictional issue is before the Court. In looking more carefully at the CA11 Local Rules, we notice that under the Rule 31-21(d), if the Court were to issue a jurisdictional question, that would stay the time for filing our brief for 30

From: Jackie Perczek <JPerczek®royblack.com> To: Paul Cassell <[email protected]> " r" "Brad Edwards (bradgpathtojustice.com)" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Position on Motion to Treat MTD as Equivalent to Jurisdictional Question Date: Tue

aul Cassell <[email protected]> " r" "Brad Edwards (bradgpathtojustice.com)" <[email protected]

for the filing of our brief while a contested (and, in our view, meritorious) jurisdictional issue is before the Court. In looking more carefully at the CA11 Local Rules, we notice that under the Rule 31-21(d), if the Court were to issue a jurisdictional question, that would stay the time for filing our brief for 30

From: "I To: Paul Cassell <[email protected]>, Jackie Perczek <[email protected]> Cc: 11( >, "Brad Edwards Subject: RE: Position on Motion to Treat MTD as Equivalent to Jurisdictional Question Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 18:14:16 +0000 Importance: Normal Pa

erczek <[email protected]> Cc: 11( >, "Brad Edwards Subject: RE: Position on Motion to Treat MTD as

for the filing of our brief while a contested (and, in our view, meritorious) jurisdictional issue is before the Court. In looking more carefully at the CA11 Local Rules, we notice that under the Rule 31-21(d), if the Court were to issue a jurisdictional question, that would stay the time for filing our brief for 30