Epstein Secrets

message. Thank you. Original Message From: Paul Cassell Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2:29 PM To: N. (USAFLS)'; (USAFLS)'; (USAFLS)' Cc: 'Brad Edwards' Subject: RE: Redacted Pleading Rather than Sealing the Entire Pleading Dear Mr. I am writing as co-counsel in the Jane Doe case. I understand that

To: I. (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: Discovery Issues in Epstein Dear

Thursda ecember 01, 2011 10:15 AM To: , I. (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: Greenberg, Benjamin (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe I. Enited States I just received a call from Bentley's assistant. Bentley is canceling today's conference call; he is feeling a little under the weather and

ly at 1:30 to make sure we're on the same page and then call him? Is there any reason why we need to make this a scheduled conference call including Edwards, or should we just initiate the call to Cassell and let him decide if he wants to postpone it to bring in Edwards? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda D

From: (USAFLS)" To: " >, ' (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe I. Enited States Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:11:50 +0000 Importance: Normal I will come on up. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursd December 01, 2011 11:05 AM To:

ly at 1:30 to make sure we're on the same page and then call him? Is there any reason why we need to make this a scheduled conference call including Edwards, or should we just initiate the call to Cassell and let him decide if he wants to postpone it to bring in Edwards? From: . I. (USAFLS) Sent: Thu

From: , (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda , December 01, 2011 11:00 AM To: , I. (USAFLS); M, (USAFLS = Subject: RE: Telephone Conference re: Epstein & Jane Doe I. Enited States Shall we confer briefly at 1:30 to make sure we're on the same page and then call him? Is there any reason why we need to make this a schedu