Epstein Secrets

uit against EPSTEIN in state and federal court seeking damages in civil litigation. During the discovery process, RODRIGUEZ was deposed by attorney BRADLEY EDWARDS who represented several of the victims. After his deposition, RODRIGUEZ contacted EDWARDS and advised that he had lists of additional victims that

covery process, RODRIGUEZ was deposed by attorney BRADLEY EDWARDS who represented several of the victims. After his deposition, RODRIGUEZ contacted EDWARDS and advised that he had lists of additional victims that he had not previously disclosed to law 2 EFTA00108883 Title: (U//FOLIO) EC REQUESTING P

O Date: 11/17/2010 INTERVIEW Approved By: Drafted By: Case ID #: -2-MM-113327 (U) SEE SUB Details: Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 11/18/2010 To: Los Angeles Attn: Riverside RA Palm Springs RA From: Miami PB-2/PBCRA Contact: Approved By: Drafted By: Case ID #: 72-MM-113327 (Pending) Title: OBSTRUCTION

uit against EPSTEIN in state and federal court seeking damages in civil litigation. During the discovery process, RODRIGUEZ was deposed by attorney BRADLEY EDWARDS who represented several of the victims. After his deposition, RODRIGUEZ contacted EDWARDS and advised that he had lists of additional victims that

covery process, RODRIGUEZ was deposed by attorney BRADLEY EDWARDS who represented several of the victims. After his deposition, RODRIGUEZ contacted EDWARDS and advised that he had lists of additional victims that he had not previously disclosed to law enforcement during the criminal investigation or af

Precedence: ROUTINE To: Los Angeles Attn: SSA Date: 11/18/2010 Riverside RA Palm Springs RA From: Miami PB-2/PBCRA Contact: SA (561)822-5949 Approved By: Drafted By: J:cjp Cas

uit against EPSTEIN in state and federal court seeking damages in civil litigation. During the discovery process, RODRIGUEZ was deposed by attorney BRADLEY EDWARDS who represented several of the victims. After his deposition, RODRIGUEZ contacted EDWARDS and advised that he had lists of additional victims that

covery process, RODRIGUEZ was deposed by attorney BRADLEY EDWARDS who represented several of the victims. After his deposition, RODRIGUEZ contacted EDWARDS and advised that he had lists of additional victims that he had not previously disclosed to law enforcement during the criminal investigation or a

ed By: Drafted By: Case ID #: 72-MM-NEW RA Date: 01/10/2019 (U) RODRIGUEZ, ALFREDO - SEE SUB Details: Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 11/18/2010 To: Los Angeles Attn: SSA Riverside RA RA From: Miami PB-2/PBCRA Contact: SA Approved By: Drafted By: J:cjp Case ID #: 72-MM-113327 (Pending) Title: ALFREDO RO

uit against EPSTEIN in state and federal court seeking damages in civil litigation. During the discovery process, RODRIGUEZ was deposed by attorney BRADLEY EDWARDS who represented several of the victims. After his deposition, RODRIGUEZ contacted EDWARDS and advised that he had lists of additional victims that

covery process, RODRIGUEZ was deposed by attorney BRADLEY EDWARDS who represented several of the victims. After his deposition, RODRIGUEZ contacted EDWARDS and advised that he had lists of additional victims that he had not previously disclosed to law enforcement during the criminal investigation or a

TO INTERVIEW MICHAEL D. Approved By: Drafted By: Case ID #: (U) RODRIGUEZ, ALFREDO - SEE SUB Details: Precedence: ROUTINE Date: 11/18/2010 To: Los Angeles Attn: Riverside RA Palm Springs RA From: Miami Contact: Approved B : Case ID #: (Pending) Title: ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ; OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE EC reques