Epstein Secrets

CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. SUPPLEMENT TO EDWARDS' MOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEIN'S UNTIMELY SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS AND TO STRIKE

REY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. SUPPLEMENT TO EDWARDS' MOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEIN'S UNTIMELY SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS AND TO STRIKE ALL EXHIBITS AND ANY REFERENCE TO DOCUMENTS CONTAINING PRIVILEGED MATERIAL

hich duplicates the disc we located in Fowler White's files." 2. The enclosed flash drive contained three separate files respectively labeled: I) "Bradley Edwards.pdf' containing 8,507 pages of documents, 2) "Epstein Searches.pdf' containing 17,348 pages of documents, and 3) "Scott Rothstein.pdf' containing 1,687 p

ained images or conies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the Court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of Farmer, Brad Edwards or his client. 2 EFTA00809604 L-1\11OS2cir WM . :sw. Edwards adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Supplement to Motion to Strike Eps

ect copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 7th day of March, 2018. JACK OLA Flor r No.: 169440 D P. VITALE JR. nda Bar No.: 115179 Attome E-Mails: and Primary E-Mail: Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West P

ndant(s). ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES g,v 25 73ne riem$4 -17.74497-.4t/ THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon Bradley J. Edwards' MOTION TO RECONFIRM EXISTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES, and the Court having reviewed the file and being fully advised in the premises. it is hereby. ORD

rings are done -- is that I am going to require motions to be filed I A copy of the Court's Order is attached hereto as Exhibit 'A'. EFTA00793345 Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Reopen Discovery Page 2 of 8 on a discovery issue-by-

going was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this Id- --day of '--. A-°" 1111 2018. JACK/SC RO Flola ar No.: 169440 DA I i P. VITALE JR. Flo • a Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mail(s): [email protected] and [email protected] Primary E-Mail: [email protected] Searcy Denney

IRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY ST

eme. Substantial discovery was taken by both parties. In 2012, Epstein voluntarily dismissed his complaint, and the sole remaining claim became Mr. Edwards' counterclaim for malicious prosecution. For the next five years, the parties litigated Mr. Edwards' claims in both the trial and appellate courts a

copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this II) day of October, 2017. JAC OLA Flo s a No.: 169440 D P. VITALE JR. a Bar No.: 115179 orney E-Mail: [email protected] and [email protected] Primary E-Mail: [email protected] Seamy Denney Scarola Bar