Epstein Secrets

CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. SUPPLEMENT TO EDWARDS' MOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEIN'S UNTIMELY SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS AND TO STRIKE

REY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. SUPPLEMENT TO EDWARDS' MOTION TO STRIKE EPSTEIN'S UNTIMELY SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS AND TO STRIKE ALL EXHIBITS AND ANY REFERENCE TO DOCUMENTS CONTAINING PRIVILEGED MATERIAL

hich duplicates the disc we located in Fowler White's files." 2. The enclosed flash drive contained three separate files respectively labeled: I) "Bradley Edwards.pdf' containing 8,507 pages of documents, 2) "Epstein Searches.pdf' containing 17,348 pages of documents, and 3) "Scott Rothstein.pdf' containing 1,687 p

ained images or conies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the Court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of Farmer, Brad Edwards or his client. 2 EFTA00809604 L-1\11OS2cir WM . :sw. Edwards adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Supplement to Motion to Strike Eps

DWARDS' PRIVILEGE LOG Counter-Plaintiff Edwards, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Supplement to his Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privilege Log, and in support states a

CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and ■l., individually, Defendants. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR COURT TO DECLARE RELEVANCE AND NON-PRIVILEGED NA

eference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privilege Log, filed on March 5, 2018. 2. In addition to those arguments, Edwards states as follows: I For brevity, Edwards shall refer to Epstein's motion as the "Motion for Court to Declare Relevance." EFTA00808645 Edwards ad

enterprise, which included access to every email on the RRA server. No one (aside from Jeffrey Epstein) ever suggested, implied, or insinuated that Brad Edwards had any involvement or knew anything about Rothstein's illegal activities. Brad Edwards was never even formally interviewed by the authorities. Yet

er', and in support states as follows: I. Edwards incorporates by reference the timeline and arguments contained in his Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privilege Log, filed on March 5, 2018.

ION OF COURT ORDER AND THE INTERVENORS' JOINDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") responds in opposition to Counter- Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") April 3, 2018, Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order', and the Intervenors' April 7, 2018, Joinder and states: INTRODUCTION

and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER AND THE INTERVENORS' JOINDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") responds in

HEARING On March 8, 2018, the parties attended a special set hearing on a number of pending Motions, including Edwards' Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privilege Log. Because the trial was o

ION OF COURT ORDER AND THE INTERVENORS' JOINDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") responds in opposition to Counter- Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") April 3, 2018, Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order', and the Intervenors' April 7, 2018, Joinder and states: INTRODUCTION

and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EDWARDS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER AND THE INTERVENORS' JOINDER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") responds in

HEARING On March 8, 2018, the parties attended a special set hearing on a number of pending Motions, including Edwards' Motion to Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Edwards' Privilege Log. Because the trial was o