Epstein Secrets

D MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein ("Plaintiff" or "Epstein"), hereby files the following Response in Opposition to Defendant Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment ("Motion") and states as follows:' SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Edwards' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgmen

OTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT EDWARDS' RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein ("Plaintiff" or "Epstein"), hereby files the following Response in Opposition to De

Epstein and settlements in those cases (191 48-52); invocation of the Fifth Amendment by Epstein and alleged co-conspirators in depositions taken in the "Epstein Actions" M., ■., and Jane Doe) and other similar lawsuits (111 54-58); "blocking" of discovery by various witnesses (9191 59-66); Epstein's purported asso

FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files

tein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against the Defendants, Scott Rothstein, ("Rothstein") and Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") (collectively referred to as "Defendants") and alleges: INTRODUCTION This litigation has at its core a law firm that has been described by a Unit

L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"), Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and E.W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jane Doe #2"), 50- 2008 CA 028058XXXXMB-AB (collectively, the "Epstein Actions"). 9. The lead attorney for RRA handling the Epstein Actions was Defendant Edwards. 10. Beginning in approximately the spring of 2009 through Oct

FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files

tein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against the Defendants, Scott Rothstein, ("Rothstein") and Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") (collectively referred to as "Defendants") and alleges: INTRODUCTION This litigation has at its core a law firm that has been described by a Unit

L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"), Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and E.W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jane Doe #2"), 50- 2008 CA 028058XXXXMB-AB (collectively, the "Epstein Actions"). 9. The lead attorney for RRA handling the Epstein Actions was Defendant Edwards. 10. Beginning in approximately the spring of 2009 through Oct