Epstein Secrets

se Management Report and would state as follows: A. BRIEF FACTUAL STATEMENT The Plaintiff seeks damages against the Defendants, Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards, based on an illegal Ponzi scheme by the Defendants, and the Plaintiff believes others as well, to market investments to outside investors in the la

se lawsuits were transferred to a newly formed firm of Farmer, Jaffee, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, LP ("Farmer Jaffee"), of which Defendant Edwards is a member. EFTA00722377 Epstein v Rothstein, et al. 2 Case No. 502009CA0408003OOC3CMBAG The Plaintiff has alleged and believes that the Defen

& Adlerr, P.A. ("RRA"). Some of these lawsuits were transferred to a newly formed firm of Farmer, Jaffee, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, LP ("Farmer Jaffee"), of which Defendant Edwards is a member. EFTA00722377 Epstein v Rothstein, et al. 2 Case No. 502009CA0408003OOC3CMBAG The Plaintiff has alleg

D MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein ("Plaintiff" or "Epstein"), hereby files the following Response in Opposition to Defendant Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment ("Motion") and states as follows:' SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Edwards' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgmen

OTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT EDWARDS' RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein ("Plaintiff" or "Epstein"), hereby files the following Response in Opposition to De

tiff's subpoena served on the Trustee, to determine the applicability of any privileges asserted by ■., Bradley Edwards, or other former clients of Farmer Jaffee, where Edwards presently works, and to prepare a privilege log. The Plaintiff, without objection, agreed and was ordered to pay the legal fees and

se Management Report and would state as follows: A. BRIEF FACTUAL STATEMENT The Plaintiff seeks damages against the Defendants, Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards, based on an illegal Ponzi scheme in which the Defendants and others are alleged to have participated. The Plaintiff contends that the scheme involv

for a period of time first by Bradley J. Edwards, individually, and them by the now defunct Law Firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, ("RRA") when Edwards joined that firm. Some of these lawsuits were transferred to a newly formed firm of Farmer, Jaffee, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, LP ("Farme

wards joined that firm. Some of these lawsuits were transferred to a newly formed firm of Farmer, Jaffee, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, LP ("Farmer Jaffee"), of which Defendant Edwards became a member when Edwards left RRA. EFTA00722472 Epstein v Rothstein, et al. I 2 Case No. 502009CA040800)OOOCMB