Epstein Secrets

ALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, CASE NO.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINT

dividually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S NOTICE OF HEARING Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.090(d) of

e of Hearing for June 6, 2017, which was filed and served on June 2, 2017. In support thereof, Epstein states: STATEMENT OF FACTS On May 26, 2017, Edwards's counsel, Mr. Scarola, sent an electronic correspondence to undersigned counsel for Epstein, inquiring if she were available for a hearing June 6,

tly scheduling Jury Trials for January, 2018 - March, 2018. As such, a two-week delay to set a trial date does not prejudice Edwards. Consequently, Edwards's Notice of Hearing should be stricken and this hearing reset, upon proper notice, on a date on which counsel can be present. WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct

ALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, CASE NO.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINT

dividually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S NOTICE OF HEARING Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.090(d) of

e of Hearing for June 6, 2017, which was filed and served on June 2, 2017. In support thereof, Epstein states: STATEMENT OF FACTS On May 26, 2017, Edwards's counsel, Mr. Scarola, sent an electronic correspondence to undersigned counsel for Epstein, inquiring if she were available for a hearing June 6,

tly scheduling Jury Trials for January, 2018 - March, 2018. As such, a two-week delay to set a trial date does not prejudice Edwards. Consequently, Edwards's Notice of Hearing should be stricken and this hearing reset, upon proper notice, on a date on which counsel can be present. WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct

/2013 Matter Name Billing Type Rate Rothstein/Edwards Hourly billing 385.00 Amount Work Hours Date

nd previous requests. Review and respond to emails from client and co- 4.50 counsels. Research and draft Motion for Clarification in response to Edwards's Notice of Hearing. Research regarding privilege log. Draft responses to Request for Admissions 1.75 Research and begin drafting privilege log 4.75 response. Rev