7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
15 / 7
Mentions
t with a lawyer." [Exhibit 1]. The source for much of that Article's information is Jack Scarola, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards. 2. In fact, Mr. Scarola is quoted to have said the following: EFTA00616236 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG a. "We would be very keen to
ew details about Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew." [Exhibit 2]. 4. Two days later, another British publication, "The Observer," reported: "Edwards' lawyer, Jack Scarola, said last week that his team intended to try and get a statement from the prince [Andrew] about what he may or may not have
s were made against him by as many as 40 girls, of whom 17 have settled civil claims they brought against the billionaire. Epstein is himself suing Brad Edwards, a lawyer for several of the girls. Epstein alleges that Mr Edwards was linked to a fraud committed by a former colleague — a claim dismissed by the
power to control professional conduct. State ex rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d at 910. Thereafter, the Supreme Court in McCrary stated: "Prohibition on comment is an acceptable alternative to prior restraint." Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d at 35-36 (
A JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. / DRAFT 4/26/11 PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION FOR A PROTECTI
, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, was quoted as stating: I) "The sole motivation for these claims against Mr. Edwards is an attempt to intimidate him so as to abandon the justified prosecution of his claims against Mr. Epstein"; and 2) "This constitutes a very subs
led "Claim: Epstein Filed Lawsuit to `Intimidate' Attorney Edwards Prosecuting Sex Abuse Cases," Jack Scarola, Esq.
LAZA, 1395 BRICKELL AVENUE, 14m FLOOR. MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131* (305) 789-9200 EFTA00583815 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988) (there is no constitutional impediment to a court prohibiting counsel from making prejudicial statements that are int
EFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, ead-laiadividually3 Defendants. DRAFT 4/26/11 PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, was quoted as stating: I) "The sole motivation for these claims against Mr. Edwards is an attempt to intimidate him so as to abandon the justified prosecution of his claims against Mr. Epstein"; and 2) "This constitutes a very subs
led "Claim: Epstein Filed Lawsuit to `Intimidate' Attorney Edwards Prosecuting Sex Abuse Cases," Jack Scarola, Esq.
he media are permissible for good cause shown in order to assure a fair trial. See McIntosh, 340 So. 2d at 910; Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988) (there is no constitutional impediment to a court prohibiting counsel from making prejudicial statements that are int
t with a lawyer." [Exhibit I]. The source for much of that Article's information is Jack Scarola, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards. 2. In fact, Mr. Scarola is quoted to have said the following: EFTA00599554 CASE NO, 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMI1 AC; a. "We would be very keen t
Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 and Gary Farmer, Esquire, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, et al., 425 N. Andrews Avenue, 42, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301. J eph Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 Christopher E. Knight Fla. Bar.
air trial. See $tate ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Mslntosh 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v, McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). 7. The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extra- judicial comment are within the pow
digging up new details about Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew." Two days later, on March 13, 2011, "The Observer" reported (copy attached): "Edwards' lawyer, Jack Scarola, said last week that his team intended to try and get a statement from the prince [Andrew] about what he may or may not . hav
commentary in this matter which either: (1) concerns Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of or being with minor females; or, (2) is injurious to Mr. Bradley Edwards' reputation, consistent with 4.3-6 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. We trust that you will agree to a swift and amicable resolution of this
ir trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of
Palm Beach EFTA00616232 Jack Scarola, Esq. March 15, 2011 Page 2 On March 13, 2011, two days later, "The Observer" reported (copy attached): "Edwards' lawyer, Jack Scarola, said last week that his team intended to try and get a statement from the prince [Andrew] about what he may or may not have
ir trial. See State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976); see also Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary, 520 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1988). The Florida Supreme Court in McIntosh recognized that restrictions on extrajudicial comment are within the power of
) Testified at trial, 3/26/98 CA v. Robert Mark Edwards (Santa Ana, California) Testified at sentencing
Dietz PE: "Managing the Sexual Misconduct Case," Physicians Insurers Association of America, San Antonio, Texas, November 3, 1994. 102. Dietz PE, McCrary GO: "Offender Profiles and Premises Liability Litigation," Premises Liability for Violent Crime Seminar, Defense Research Institute, Boston, Massac
Entities connected to both Bradley Edwards and McCrary

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSONJack Scarola
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Weissing
PERSONFISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATIONDarren Indyke
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Lesley Groff
PERSONSpencer Kuvin
PERSON
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley
ORGANIZATIONAtterbury Goldberger & Weiss
ORGANIZATION
Joe Biden
PERSON