Epstein Secrets

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J, EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA04080

, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. I East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, Esq. 301 SE 7d1 Str

ward Blvd. Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 42

aintiff/Counter- Defendant, hereby certifies that this Motion is made in good faith. The undersigned counsel further certifies that the affidavit of the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant is likewise in good faith, and is based upon his well-founded fear that he cannot receive a fair hearing or trial from Judge Hafele. WE HEREBY CER

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408

ry responses responsive to Epstein's Requests. In support thereof, Epstein states: I Them are still outstanding damages discovery requests to which Edwards's Response is not due until after the Court's deadline date for the filing of this Motion. As such, an additional Motion may be required upon receip

ANSWER: Objection. Irrelevant, immaterial, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and an unwarranted invasion of Bradley Edwards' right to economic privacy. 15. State the amount of gross income that you received from the provision of goods or services other than while acting a

rey Epstein as to Bradley Edwards through intemet searches. 27. Provide an explanation for your belief that law enforcement is still investigating the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Identify contacts with govemment/law enforcement, media, other attorneys, or anyone else from which you claim to form this belief,

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408

ry responses responsive to Epstein's Requests. In support thereof, Epstein states: I Them are still outstanding damages discovery requests to which Edwards's Response is not due until after the Court's deadline date for the filing of this Motion. As such, an additional Motion may be required upon receip

ANSWER: Objection. Irrelevant, immaterial, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and an unwarranted invasion of Bradley Edwards' right to economic privacy. 15. State the amount of gross income that you received from the provision of goods or services other than while acting a

rey Epstein as to Bradley Edwards through intemet searches. 27. Provide an explanation for your belief that law enforcement is still investigating the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Identify contacts with govemment/law enforcement, media, other attorneys, or anyone else from which you claim to form this belief,

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408

ry responses responsive to Epstein's Requests. In support thereof, Epstein states: I Them are still outstanding damages discovery requests to which Edwards's Response is not due until after the Court's deadline date for the filing of this Motion. As such, an additional Motion may be required upon receip

ANSWER: Objection. Irrelevant, immaterial, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and an unwarranted invasion of Bradley Edwards' right to economic privacy. 15. State the amount of gross income that you received from the provision of goods or services other than while acting a

rey Epstein as to Bradley Edwards through intemet searches. 27. Provide an explanation for your belief that law enforcement is still investigating the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Identify contacts with govemment/law enforcement, media, other attorneys, or anyone else from which you claim to form this belief,

roward Blvd. Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 42

he instant proceedings based on the fact that in the defense hereof, Mr. Epstein would be forced to invoke his Fifth Amendment privileges given Mr. Edwards attempts to invalidate his Non- Prosecution Agreement in the quasi-criminal matter, while at the same time attempting to include as evidence in the

n related quasi-criminal proceedings. In support thereof Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN states as follows: 1. Undersigned counsel for the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, has been Mr. Epstein's primary defense counsel for ten years. 2. Pending in the United States District Court for the Southern Dis