Epstein Secrets

tance that you discussed the contents of the documents with? A I don't recall anybody except my attorneys. Q Did you have any communication with Bradley Edwards regarding the content of those documents? A I don't recall. Q Since receiving those documents, did you have any communication with Bradley Edwar

2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which case? MR. SCAROLA: This is the subpoena duces tecum issued in t

te Court issues and not to be considered in the Show Cause proceedings. 2 EFTA00793402 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6482 Filed 10/19/18 Page 3 of 97 EDWARDS: ... The representation was made on the record by Mr. Link that he provided it within his law firm and his client, that being Mr. Epstein. When fur

cribe the contents? A When you say documents, you mean pages? I'm sorry? Q Yes, sir. Pages. A Well, I can remember the emails with respect to Brad Edwards -- Q Excuse me. Pardon me. I'm stopping you, sir. That's no responsive to my question. And I don't want you on this record to be disclosing the co

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant: T,TNK 4 ROCKFNRArN P A By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE For Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant: ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. By JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE For Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs:

tance that you discussed the contents of the documents with? A I don't recall anybody except my attorneys. Q Did you have any communication with Bradley Edwards regarding the content of those documents? A I don't recall. Q Since receiving those documents, did you have any communication with Bradley Edwar

a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which case? MR. SCAROLA: This is the subpoena duces tecum issued in the

ed from documents or data over which a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which case? MR. SCAROLA

.M., E.W., and Jane Doe 10 EFTA00793508 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6488 Filed 10/22/18 Page 11 of 165 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein SERVICE LIST Bradley J. Edwards FLBN Brittany N. Henderson FLBN 118247 Edwards Pottinger LLC Attorneys for Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Jack Scarola, Esi= Fl

4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant: LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE For Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant: ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. By JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE For Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs:

, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ) ) ) Petitioner/Counter-Defendant, ) ) vs. No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG ) SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, ) and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ) individually, ) ) Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. ) ) West Palm Beach, Florida November 2nd, 2018 10:25 a.m. - 1:06 p.m. Plaintiff/Counte

ss the proposed additional exhibits. The witness that was the potential cause of concern has been withdrawn for the purposes of the action by Mr. Edwards against Mr. Epstein, so that is moot at this juncture. And we'll launch into the discussion relative to the proposed exhibits. I don't know if --

o you want to also be involved and set it up some other time? Bradley Edwards." MR. SCAROLA: Right. And the suggestion is made that this impeaches Brad Edwards' testimony that he only met with Mr. Rothstein and spoke about the Epstein cases on two occasions. Well, first of all, it doesn't do that. Palm B

al, whether it's admissible or not, whether it's really relevant or not, based upon the allegations included within the original complaint against Brad Edwards and the malicious prosecution claim that is currently being prosecuted in front of this Court. There is no way to excuse this nondisclosure, eith

Counter-Defendant: LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE and KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE For The Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, Florid

stand. 13 order that he entered. And I'll quote fron it. I) Good afternoon. Jack Goldberger on behalf of la This is Order on Counter-plaintiff Bradley Edwards' la Mr. Epstein. 14 Motion to Deternine Status of Punitive Damage IS Your Honor, as a general statement of the lax, Is Discovery and Applicabi

last wok just 4 and Any Reference to Docunenta Containing 4 So my suggestion to your Honor is that wo deal 5 Privileged Materials, Listed on Edwards' Privilege o first with the procedural issue because, as I said, 4 Log. 4 that will narrow issue. significantly. And then / MR. SCAROER: Yes,

uct privileged 14 bearing the expense to turn these docunents over to is materials. So Judge Carney was appointed a special IS Earner Jaffe and Bred Edwards for purposes of it master to make a determination as to what should 16 preparing a privilege log. 17 and could be turned over and report back t

ached to the 3 LINK a ROCKEIIBACH, P.A. pretrial stipulation on December 22, 2017. And 4 4 then for the first tine on March 5th of 2010 the By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE 5 new exhibit list was filed. If you compare the S By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE 6 For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: SEARCY, DENNEY, SCARO

iff/Counter-Defendant, vs. 4 the court. It has caused me to have to SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; 7 engage in an inordinate amount of time to BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, 8 the exclusion of other natters that needed Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. 4 my attention. 10 While the Court understands the

thank Hr. Cassell for being here today. Your Honor, this is Mr. Epstein's motion to remove this case from the trial docket. It was prompted by Mr. Edwards' motion to separate the trials, which was motion -- for the obvious reason, when he • filed his motion to sot the case in the above-styled cause

laintiff/Counter-Defendant: 4 LINK 4 ROCKENBACH P.A. , So it's against that backdrop we will • proceed. WO will hear the motion filed by 5 By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE Epstein to remove the case from the trial 6 By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE ^ docket relative to Florida Rule of Civil 9 For Defendant/Coun

SCAROLA: Thank you, air. Your Honor, have uo decided what notions we're going to hoar? THE COURT: Yes. My understanding as I la;' was going to be Edwards' Second Supplement to Motion in Lamine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence, and of course in that sane vein roster'. Notice of Service of Unre

nderstand that. I otherwise, the Court retains jurisdiction to award 9 THE COURT: Titoorder eays that Fowler Mit. sanctions in favor of Farmer, Brad Edwards or his 10 will not retain any copies of 0he documents .1 client," end quote. 1i contained on the disk provided to it nor shall any • MR. LIN

1 APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff/counter-Defendant: LINK 4 ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE For Defendant/counter-Plaintiff: SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART 4 SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boul

: Same. BY MR. CASSELL: Q Did you have any reason to slant your testimony so it would be biased against any other part in this matter, including Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: Same. BY MR. LINK: Q Isn't it true, sir, that you have substantial reasons to give inaccurate information to the answer to Palm Beac

ircumstances, absent some specific prohibition by the court with regard to those subject matters. MR. LINK: Well, you have finished on behalf Mr. Edwards. Are you now assisting Mr. Cassell and L.M. as their counsel? MR. SCAROLA: Oh, no. MR. LINK: You have already said you were done, Mr. Scarola. M

For Jeffrey Epstein: LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE For Jeffrey Epstein: ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By JACK A. GOL