Epstein Secrets

Ray said. Friday's ruling followed an April 13 hearing in Fort Lauderdale, during which Judge Ray granted motions from former Farmer Jaffe partner Bradley J. Edwards, who represented nine of Epstein's victims, and three of those victims to join Farmer Jaffe's sanctions bid. He also ordered them to file a summary

ate all the circumstances concerning the theft of privileged documents that found their way into the hands of a convicted billionaire child abuser," Edwards' counsel Jack Scarola of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA said Friday. Farmer Jaffe said In Its March 19 sanctions motion that recent de

offender. Reached Friday, his current counsel, Scott Link of Link and Rockenbach PA, told Law360, "Mr. Epstein has never had the disc In question. Brad Edwards has already admitted that fact In court. Why is Edwards afraid to make the emails public?" Link told the court that he found the CD In one of 36 bo

ubstantial compliance made in good faith," Judge Ray said. The sanctions matter is before the bankruptcy court in the liquidation case of law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, where Edwards had been practicing when he represented several of Epstein's child sex-abuse victims. During the bankruptcy of RRA, which collapsed

rint?section-florida Edwards is represented by Jack Scarola and David P. Vitale of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA. The case is In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, case number 0:09-bk-34791, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al.,

h a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards. MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which DRAFT !!!! NOT PROOFREAD EFTA00804218 58 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

EFTA00804212 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 firm was retained, voluntarily by Mr. Edwards and his law firm, so that there had been in the record alleged privileged emails for years in this case, and you have not asked specific questions

EFTA00804202 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q Did you have any communication with Bradley Edwards regarding the content of those documents? A I don't recall. Q Since receiving those documents, did you have any communication with Bradley Edwar

communications concerning or containing information derived from documents or data over which a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards. MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking

ards Fistos & Lehrman PL said in its March 19 motion that recent developments in ongoing litigation between Epstein and former Fanner Jaffe partner Bradley J. Edwards, who represented several of Epstein's victims, showed that Fowler White retained a copy of the confidential documents and that they had been passed

mer Jaffe filed its motion in bankruptcy court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, in the liquidation case of law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, where Edwards had been practicing when he represented several of Epstein's child sex-abuse victims. Edwards is representing Farmer Jaffe in the sanctions matter.

tained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of Farmer, Brad Edwards or his client." The bankruptcy court permitted Fowler White access to the electronic data because the firm could make the copies and number the doc

on has caused irreparable harm." Farmer Jaffe filed its motion in bankruptcy court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, in the liquidation case of law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, where Edwards had been practicing when he represented several of Epstein's child sex-abuse victims. Edwards is representing Farmer Jaffe in the san

ds Fistos & Lehrman PL had said in a March 19 motion that recent developments in ongoing litigation between Epstein and former Farmer Jaffe partner Bradley J. Edwards, who represented several of Epstein's victims, showed that Fowler White retained a copy of confidential documents and that they had been passed alo

nt, is wholly inappropriate," Epstein said. He added that the motion is a "transparent and frivolous attempt" to divert the court's attention from Edwards' repeated flouting of legitimate discovery requests for documents that Epstein says would kill Edwards' malicious prosecution counterclaim against E

dwards' malicious prosecution counterclaim against Epstein. Farmer Jaffe filed its motion last month in the bankruptcy liquidation case of law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, where Edwards had been practicing when he represented several of Epstein's child sex-abuse victims. Edwards is representing Farmer Jaffe in the sa

n of Carlton Fields. Edwards is represented by Jack Scarola and David P. Vitale of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA. The case is In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, case number 0:09-bk-34791, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al.,

an PL brought the sanctions bid in March after recent developments in ongoing state court litigation between Epstein and former Farmer Jaffe partner Bradley J. Edwards, who represented several of Epstein's victims, revealed that a CD containing more than 27,500 pages of confidential Farmer Jaffe emails and about 3

Epstein's current counsel In early 2018. The scope of the matter was narrowed significantly at the start of Friday's hearing after Farmer Jaffe and Edwards Informed the court the day before that they wanted to voluntarily dismiss Epstein. They said the limited discovery they had performed made clear th

s or copies of the documents. The issue ended up before the bankruptcy court because Epstein filed his subpoena in the liquidation case of law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, where Edwards had been practicing when he represented several of Epstein's child sex-abuse victims. EFTA00805053 Scarola noted during Friday's h