Epstein Secrets

N, against Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, and are not part of the legal claims brought by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, against Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. However, this Proposal is intended to resolve all such claims if available.

Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby serves this Proposal for Settlement upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ, P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R

. SCOTT ROITHSTETN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DE

hereby serves this Proposal for Settlement upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ, P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442. 2. This Proposal is being made on behalf of

S'S MOTION FOR FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., by and through his undersigned counsel and pursu

for all claims brought against him in Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein's Complaint. Not only is there an absence of competent evidence to demonstrate that Edwards participated in any fraud against Epstein, the evidence uncontrovertibly demonstrates the propriety of every aspect of Edwards' involvement in the p

rt claims. The only cases not resolved are this case and two (2) cases in state court (all three Plaintiffs are represented by Plaintiff's counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq. and his firm). I 5. Plaintiffs in other filed cases were represented by various law firms as the court is aware. 6. With the additional disco

ng party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Snyder v. Cheezem Development Corp., 373 So. 2d 719, 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Rule 1.510(c), Fla. R. Civ. P. Once the moving party conclusively establishes that the nonmoving party cannot prevail, it is incumbent on the nonmoving party to submit eviden

N, against Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, and are not part of the legal claims brought by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, against Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. However, this Proposal is intended to resolve all such claims if available.

Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby serves this Proposal for Settlement upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ, P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R

. SCOTT ROITHSTETN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DE

hereby serves this Proposal for Settlement upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ, P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442. 2. This Proposal is being made on behalf of

st Palm Beach, FL 33401 FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.A., 425 N. Andrews Ave Suite

agree on a mediator. If they are unable to agree, any party may apply to the Court for appointment of a mediator in conformity with Rule 1.720 (1), Fla. R. Civ. P. The lead attorney or party shall file and serve on all parties and the mediator a Notice of Mediation giving the time, place, and date of the m