Epstein Secrets

CUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and ■., individually, Defendant(s). ORDER SPECIALLY SETTING HEARING THIS CAUSE having come to be considered upon the ORDER SPECIAL

vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and ■., individually, Defendant(

e • Burlington & Rockenbach, 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-721-0400 Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards Bradle J. Edwards Es uire Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman, ■. 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 3 EFTA00595675 EDWARDS ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: S02009CA04

Supplement to Response in Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings; Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Omnibus Motion in Limine; EFTA00595673 EDWARDS ADV. EPSTEIN Case No.: S02009CA040800XXXXMBAG Order Specially Setting Hearing Response in Opposition to Jeffrey

. CML TRIAL & APPELLATE LAW December 1, 2017 Via Email Jeffrey Epstein 6100 Red Hook Quarter, B3 St. Thomas, USVI 00802 Re: Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards File No.: 100.001 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd , Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Fronde 33401 T 561.727 3600 F 561.727 3601 Dear Jeffrey: Attached pl

are summary of Judge's ruling from the October 3, 2017 hearing 1.90 750.50 re J. Epstein's Motion to Overrule Objections and Compel B. 395.00/hr Edwards to answer questions in preparation of B. Edwards' upcoming deposition KBR Review executed Order Specially Setting Hearing from Judge Donald 0.10

ions; telephone conference with J. Epstein TLC Work on Response to B. Edwards' Request for Judicial Notice; work 9.80 2,205.00 on comprehensive Omnibus Motion in Limine and Appendix; work on 225.00/hr creating Appendix of documents and locating same; email with D. Vitale re depositions; work on list of p

USE 517 NORTH CALPIMN STREET TALLAHASSEE. FL 32301.1231 Pursuant to Your Honor's Order, enclosed please find the following responses on behalf of Bradley J. Edwards to motions filed on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein by September 25, 2017: 1. Edwards' Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment on

closed please find the following responses on behalf of Bradley J. Edwards to motions filed on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein by September 25, 2017: 1. Edwards' Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment on Fourth Amended Counterclaim; 2. 3. Edwards' Response to Epstein's Omnibus Moti

1. Edwards' Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment on Fourth Amended Counterclaim; 2. 3. Edwards' Response to Epstein's Omnibus Motion in Limine; 4. Edwards' Response to Epstein's Motion to Strike Discovery Objections and Compel Responses; 5. Edwards' Response in Opposition to Eps

a, Es.. Jack Goldber er, Es.. Marc Nurik, Es . Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Fred Haddad E, . Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire

el, hereby files this Motion for an enlargement of time within which to Respond to Motions filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") and to continue the hearing set by the Court in this matter on October 3, 2017. In support thereof, Epstein states: INTRODUCTIQN On September 15

Motion for Summary Judgment. Epstein timely filed his four (4) additional Motions as contemplated by this Court on September 25, 2017; to wit: his Omnibus Motion in Limine; a Motion to Compel discovery related to Edwards's Privilege Log; a Motion to Compel responses to Discovery; and a Motion to Compel answe

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, -VS- SCOTT individually, EDWARDS, L.M., E.W., Intervenors. ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. individually, and and JANE DOE, Respondents CASE NO. 4D18-0762 APPENDIX TO RESPONSE TO PETI

derdale, FL 33301 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. EDWARDS POTT1NGER LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, St

s moved to exclude the testimony of twenty witnesses and one category of witness that Defendant describes as "witnesses expected to be presented." (Omnibus Motion in Limine at 21-22.) In addition, until the Court determines what case will be tried (i.e., Defendant's malicious prosecution claim or Defendant's "

TY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, CASE NO.: 502009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. JUDGE: HAFELE SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT/

el, hereby files this Motion for an enlargement of time within which to Respond to Motions filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") and to continue the hearing set by the Court in this matter on October 3, 2017. In support thereof, Epstein states: INTRODUCTION On September 15

Motion for Summary Judgment. Epstein timely filed his four (4) additional Motions as contemplated by this Court on September 25, 2017; to wit: his Omnibus Motion in Limine; a Motion to Compel discovery related to Edwards's Privilege Log; a Motion to Compel responses to Discovery; and a Motion to Compel answe

TY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, CASE NO.: 502009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. JUDGE: HAFELE SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT/

el, hereby files this Motion for an enlargement of time within which to Respond to Motions filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") and to continue the hearing set by the Court in this matter on October 3, 2017. In support thereof, Epstein states: INTRODUCTION On September 15

Motion for Summary Judgment. Epstein timely filed his four (4) additional Motions as contemplated by this Court on September 25, 2017; to wit: his Omnibus Motion in Limine; a Motion to Compel discovery related to Edwards's Privilege Log; a Motion to Compel responses to Discovery; and a Motion to Compel answe