Epstein Secrets

gned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.380 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves this Court to enter an order compelling the Defendant Bradley Edwards, yet again, to provide responses to Plaintiff's Request for Production. Plaintiff likewise requests that this Court order sanctions against Defenda

» that > some >> of the items to which you are objecting, for example, are electronic >> communications to/from government entities which, as Mr. Edwards is >> likely aware from his days as a government attorney, are legally a >> matter of > public >> record, will not, in fact, be privileged under

ward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Fernier, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehr

ument 177-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/06/2012 Page 5 of 22 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA0408003OOO134B Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, PlaintiffiCounter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLE

ISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON EDWARDS' RENEW

DLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON EDWARDS' RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THIS MATTER came before the Court on Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Schedule Hearing

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY

ward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrm

Levi o „Ni ,tart c.,. A144- 1..2.6b(9(5) dna.. 776- Liu/746'm / 7" 5‘->zel 33196'4- 91:1- c'c-"D°0- --274 EFTA00609375 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Division AG Order on Epstein's Motion to Compel and for Sanctions Page 2 of 2 74 Attais 75-e- Matt 710A: e et led

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE I 5th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040801:0OOCXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLE

VISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION REGARDING DISCOVERY Plaintif

adings needed to be addressed and directed Epstein to file an Amended Complaint. 2. On July 13, 2011 at the hearing on Defendant Bradley Edwards' ("Edwards") Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, this Court stated that it "want[ed] to get a complaint out there that withstands the motion to dismiss b

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J

D MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein ("Plaintiff" or "Epstein"), hereby files the following Response in Opposition to Defendant Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment ("Motion") and states as follows:' SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Edwards' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgmen

OTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT EDWARDS' RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein ("Plaintiff" or "Epstein"), hereby files the following Response in Opposition to De

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY

SION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXX'XMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO POSTPONE DEPOS

Act-& _et. e-14 der :Jet, oi „ 0 - Joel „a(' -7--(72t 2 afrn 4)A...c.c. 1.0 citi.c. erCri .00 EFTA00616109 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Division AG Order on Epstein's Motion for Protective Order Page 2 of 2 DONE AND QRDERED in Chambers in West Palm Be

ancA 7,tn..1 O2 7t Con& it-a IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXX'XMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY

ISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ORDER REFERRING THE CASE TO MEDIATION THIS MATTER c

. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. O

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY

n ("Epstein"), hereby offers the following reply to Edwards' Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion for a Protective Order to prevent Defendant, Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), from inquiring into certain areas at the second deposition of Plaintiff, and to terminate the deposition of the Plaintiff for the reaso

ant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO EDWARDS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER RELATING TO HIS DEPOSITION AND MOTION TO TERMINATE DEPOSITION Plaintiff,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY

nt, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS' DAMAGES CLAIMED IN SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM THIS MATTER came before the Court on Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards' Second Amended

. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. O

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 151° JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800X300CMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY

COPY RECEIVED FOR FILING DEC 13 2011 SHARON CLERK CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION wiR.SORCKLER PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO BRADLEY J. EDWARDS' REQUEST TO PRODUCE Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.350 of t

and all other contracts for legal services in the defense of criminal charges or other civil claims against EFTA00286378 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Div. AG Mr. Epstein not related to the claims in the Second Amended Complaint as being irrelevant, overbroad, and pr

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800X)CaMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants.